Replies

I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS were that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari.

I had no idea Mr. Kerchner was that delusional. There is no way the conservative Justices would have participated in undoing a 2 year old election. That would be the worst type of judicial activism.

>> I had no idea Mr. Kerchner was that delusional <<

Hey, to paraphrase Madame Babs Boxer, please don’t call him “Mr.”

Please call him “CDR” — since you can be sure he worked hard to get that title.

In November of 2008 (at the same time that Obama was elected) Fremont, Nebraska voters passed an ordinance requiring landlords to verify the legal residency status of prospective renters before renting to them.

The ACLU has filed a lawsuit asking the courts to undo that election. The court has not in any way balked at that request. A stay was issued immediately to keep that ordinance from going into effect and the parties have until this coming January to get their arguments in line.

Just like the judge in Oklahoma issued a stay until the court decides whether to overturn the voters’ will in their anti-sharia Constitutional amendment.

Just like the NE Supreme Court overturned the will of the voters on Nebraska’s Constitutional amendment disallowing the forced consolidation of schools.

Just as the courts have overturned the will of Iowa and California voters who amended their Constitutions to disallow gay marriage.

Now, were you saying something about a court not being willing to overturn the results of an election? Wherever are you getting that idea from?

I had no idea Mr. Kerchner was that delusional. There is no way the conservative Justices would have participated in undoing a 2 year old election.

Well heck, I didn't know there was a 2 year statute of limitations on having disregarded the constitution and constitutional matters.
Damn, you learn something new every day. (/sarcasm)