.. Ding!
If Apuzzo/Kerchner is denied, is SCOTUS the next step?
This case is going pretty well the way I imagined it would.
Its now an international job, open to all comers if their Mother was smart enough to give birth in America and create an anchor baby. Neither parent need be a citizen, the constitution be damned.
ping
The fact that the court in effect calls Apuzzo “out of his mind” is another red flag. The judge doth protest too much. There is no way that a person is “out of their mind” for making this case.
I wonder when this court’s claim was made in relation to the poll that came out saying that 60% of the American public doesn’t necessarily believe the lie we’ve been fed about Obama’s origins. What judge in his right mind would say that 60% of the public is insane?
Sullivan would have “justified” the entire Holocaust. He may be accurately predicting what will happen in this banana republic/Obama coup/Fourth Reich mentality, but even I could predict that. Just figure out the opposite of justice and that is what any lawless coup will do. Like clockwork.
of course it is being dismissed...if they allow it the majority of our government will end up in jail...IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
We have witnessed an internal coup d’tat over the past few decades...slowly but surely they have overthrown our Republic. It is gone.
10-446
KERCHNER, CHARLES, ET AL. V. OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.
The motion of Western Center for Journalism for leave to
file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a
writ of certiorari is denied.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112910zor.pdf
Starwise, again, I am not a lawyer, but have worked with enough over the years to have some sense of the process at least. The Supreme Court didn’t waive the right of the Respondent to file a responsive brief, the attorneys for the Respondent did.
Part of the procedure after the filing of a SCOTUS procedure is to afford the Responent the opportunity to file a responsive brief, or to waive that right before the petition goes to conference. Checking the Kerchner docket, the Respondent’s attorneys had until 11/3/10 either to file a response or to file the waiver. Apparently, in this case, Obama’s attorneys file a waiver.
Filing the Waiver, in and of itself, doesn’t assure denial of cert, nor does it close off the Respondent’s opportunity to file responsive briefs when/if cert is granted when a waiver has been filed. The granting of cert sets off a round of briefing in which the respondents counsel do participate.