I don’t think it was really “whining.” I was, however, scratching my head at some of the descriptions. “Conservative Country Clubbers” is an oxymoron. And what about Eisenhower as a candidate was not serious?
What the commentary does do is try to attribute a whole slew of things to Palin that I have never heard her affirm and introduces a bunch of irrelevant mumbo-jumbo that hardly qualify as criteria for evaluating presidential candidates (IMO.) So, in that, I agree with you that it is past time that she announce that she is running and make public exactly what her positions are. Then we will have something to discuss. As it is, all we really have is her past record and statements which, in many important areas, directly conflict with the caricature that her supporters are trying to paint.
And Bray — I am not a Stalinist, nor anti-Palin. Your insults strewn at some imaginary big-bad-enemy-group-of-freepers only undermines what credibility you may have.
Really, seems that I may have hit a nerve for your Stalinist thug tactics to silence anybody on FR who dares to say a positive thing about Palin. Guess we are getting a look at the tactics that will be in place for the next 10 yrs of the Palin Presidency.
You will notice I never went to find a group of thugs on a ping list like your dear leader. So who is trying to silence who? Now who is your candidate who I should be following?
Second, I have no credibility on FR but worlds more than you. How many years has she been in DC? Oh yeah, none which is my main point. Guess all us Tea Partiers are just easily duped by her charms ass opposed to your gang of thugs.
Pray for America