Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: paulycy
Despite all the negative doom and gloom that Huck and others ply on this website I have asked again and again who would be a stronger all-around conservative candidate (not necessarily the "most" conservative candidate) and all I hear are the sound of crickets. Even on this very thread.

It seems to me that everyone presumed to be a potential candidate is fundamentally flawed. That's not "despite" the doom and gloom. I would think that IS the doom and gloom.

117 posted on 11/26/2010 2:25:36 PM PST by Huck (Antifederalist BRUTUS should be required reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
It seems to me that everyone presumed to be a potential candidate is fundamentally flawed. That's not "despite" the doom and gloom. I would think that IS the doom and gloom.

Life is like that. You have to make your choice from the flawed human beings who are actually IN the race.

Nobody is even in the race yet. But of all the contenders I believe that Sarah has the best chance of all of them to beat both 0bama and Hillary.

Things could change. Nothing is written in stone. But when I said that "I tire" of the sniping it is just this: you can be negative against every human who is or ever was. What I humbly suggest is that you find the best characteristics among the various contestants and champion something positive. That makes for a stronger Conservative movement. It doesn't pull our side down.

122 posted on 11/26/2010 2:37:44 PM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality. Save America From Bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson