Replies

This is not a discredited rumor Dude. There are numerous missile experts who have publicly stated that it was definitely a missile. If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?

There are numerous missile experts who have publicly stated that it was definitely a missile.

Based on nothing more than a short clip of highly-zoomed video.

That these "experts" can make such a definite call, based on such limited data, calls into question the judgment of said experts.

If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?

If the blogger lays out all the evidence for why he thinks it's an airplane contrail, and the general gives zero real evidence for his position, it probably puts it at a push. When I can look at the images for myself and confirm that what the blogger is saying is right, I don't need to choose between one opinion or another anymore. I can see for myself that the evidence says it's an airplane contrail.

" If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?"

It depends on the evidence each provides. The contrail blogger has put forth a very powerful case with convincing evidence. What has your retiree put forth.....other than his opinion?

If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?

Depends. Does the retired NORAD general have a blog? If so then he is just another pathetic blogger who should be ignored because everyone one knows bloggers are a bunch of low life pimps who should all be taken out and shot.

So the answer to the question would be a coin flip. It is after all, the only honorable way to decide which rotten blogger is telling the truth.

If the general is a blogger that is. If he is not than of course he is telling the truth and the blogger is telling a lie.

So it obviously all comes down to what forum the individual used to report their findings. If one used the MSM to report their findings than it is true, and if one used a blog to report their findings then that person cannot be trusted, because we should never trust a blogger like we trust the MSM.

At least that is what I have learned in the last few years when it comes down to who those on the political right believe and trust.

Just an observation is all, just an observation.

As for me, I know it was a missile, because God told me so. He can always be trusted. After all God is neither a blogger nor does He work for the MSM.

If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?

I hate to tell you, but back in my Air Force days I was exposed to a few Generals and the quality wasn't all that consistent. Ambition, arse-kissing, moderate intelligence and a refusal to admit error (along with the luck of your chickens not coming home to roost) could carry you far.

There are numerous missile experts who have publicly stated that it was definitely a missile. If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?

Yes.

"If an online blogger says it was an airplane and a retired NORAD general says it was a missile who are you going to believe?"

I'm ex-USAF. Generals don't walk on water...

If the general has only spent a minute looking at 14 seconds of time-scrambled and looped SeeBS video -- and the blogger has spent many hours studying that PLUS ALL the available evidence -- including still photos and radar tracks -- I'd give the blogger serious consideration.