Posted on 11/19/2010 11:25:49 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
London: Sarah Palin has branded US President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle `unpatriotic' and `racist'.
In leaked extracts of her new book, Palin delves into the minefield of racial politics, arguing that Mr Obama is among those who regarded the conservative tea party movement as racially prejudiced and who thinks, "America is a fundamentally unjust and unequal country," reports the Telegraph.
To back it up with evidence, she dredged up a quote from a 2008 campaign speech in which Mrs Obama said, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country".
Palin went on to say: "I guess this shouldn't surprise us, since both of them spent almost two decades in the pews of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright's church listening to his rants against America and white people."
In America By Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag, Palin characterised the First Lady as only being proud "when her husband started winning elections".
The attack is likely to deepen the impression that the former Alaska governor is too divisive a figure to win the presidency.
The fuse is lit and I cant wait.Can you imagine the debate between Palin and the imposter?I doubt he runs for reelection so it may be the beast.That debate would be just as interesting.
She doesn’t pull any punches does she? heh
Heck, she's starting to throw combinations now ;^)
Do you hear that Obama? She’s coming......... and she’s coming for you.
LOL Floats like a butterfly, swats like a Kodiak!
I wonder how "divisive" they thought Obama when he told Latinos to punish those who don't want to reward illegality?
The word “divisive” is not the word that we know. In liberal terms it means “any action that embarrasses progressives or democrats”.
Of course, we know its not divisive by our standards, because it is not further dividing anyone. Those who find her ‘divisive’ would never vote for her in any regard.
Note that no matter what Holder, or Obozo do, they are NEVER labeled divisive. You see, they are ‘uniters’ and its just that us bitter clingers are too dumb to get their message.
and loaded for bear.
As a frequent listener to the racist Mildred Gaddis program on WCHB-AM (Urban talk radio in Detroit), and a former UAW committeeman who had poor poor picked upon pitiful me africanhyphenamericans up to the point on the top of his head, my observation is that ahyphenas have long reserved the right to make unfair and unjust accusations against “europeans” (as they often call us). They have gotten away with that crappola for decades because us “europeans” tend to either knee jerk apologize or not attempt to refute their bogus charges thus satisfying them that they are right. It sounds like someone has turned the tables on their agenda again and will thus be assailed as “you bes one of them racists” for doing so.
Playing the race card without merit is always their last straw and should always be called out as being racist.
Alinsky: “Accuse your opponent of what you are doing.”
We have had so many liars as President. The Question is: Can someone who tells the truth be elected?
Sarah tells it like it is.
Romney , Huckabee and others sugar coat it and ignore it.
Obama and his wife are racist.
Obama is not a Christian.
Obama is a lying sack of crap
Obama is either the most stupid President to ever hit the White House or he is deliberately trying to destroy America. There is no in between.
Only liberals and Palin haters want us to believe she is divisive. She’s clearly the most conservative of all possible 2012 candidates and she has more balls than most of the men in the Republican Party.
The injured party is not Sarah Palin, it is her publisher. It is not Sarah who is suing, it is Harper Collins. They no doubt have a signed non disclosure.
“LOL Floats like a butterfly, swats like a Kodiak!”
That is bumper sticker material!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.