Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 1010RD
We agree, but you don’t have to “dismantle” the TSA at all and actually as conservatives we don’t want to lose the contrast. In the original enabling bill there’s an opt out provision after two years. All it takes is a few airports - Houston for instance - to opt out and allow private contractors to take over.

Again, I believe it should be on an airline level. Anything else hides the inane costs for these ineffective and time wasting 'protections.' They must be airline employees, answerable directly to the desk management at each airport, so that when one of these yahoos exceeds civility to play strong arm games, they can be fired on the spot.

78 posted on 11/16/2010 1:04:01 PM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

I get your point and as conservatives we share the same goals. Ideally we would like that, but how do you get there from here?

Step one - privatization, that gets rid of the TSA and wounds it for a generation, hopefully.

(the persistence of bad ideas is incredible and we live in a world of lost knowledge/wisdom)

Step two - privatize airports.

They should be owned like condos with each gate being owned by bidders just like seats on an exchange or at a condo and without limitation.

The streets, ticketing gates, etc. would be treated as common areas and fees would be charged against each gate ownership.

Governments should own/run as little as possible


79 posted on 11/16/2010 1:59:43 PM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson