Posted on 11/16/2010 7:43:43 AM PST by EternalVigilance
Thirty-one-year-old John Tyner, a 31-year-old recently unleashed the “Don’t tase me, Bro” moment of airport security. While about to receive a genital check from TSA security, Tyner agreed to a search of non-intimate areas but said, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested.” However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.
CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.
“Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”
Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”
So, Muslim women will not be subject to a full body scan or a pat-down on much of their elaborately concealed bodies. Feeling secure yet?
Add this to the growing proof that political correctness is not merely totalitarian but suicidal. The president made an exception to airline security protocol big enough to drive a jihad through — and applied it only to the adherents of Islam. Roman Catholic nuns can be groped en masse, but Obama rushed to defend the dignity of Muslim women.
Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear. Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim.
That link didn’t seem to work.
Try this one...
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/napolitano-adjustments-more-come-body-pa
Interesting. She refused to say yea or nay.
Between this, and the blog article about the Gadsden flag that's been sitting in breaking news all morning, it's shaping up to be a strange day on FR.
My bad! Thanx!!!
CA....
From the tape at the link you provided, her response to a question about whether Muslim demands concerning searches will be met.
“Adjustments will be made where they need to be made.” - Janet Napolitano
Pretty weaselly response, one that raises serious legitimate questions, and doesn’t answer them.
I pray for obama every day. Psalm 109:8-9
Looks like a hijab to me.
Does anyone know if Napolitano is lesbian? cus she sure looks like it. No wonder she’s okay with decent citizens being sexually harassed and humiliated.
I’m pretty sure being homosexual is the primary credential needed to be part of this alleged president’s regime.
Unless it is in Philly, and it could be a do-rag...
Whatever the reason - it's totalitarian to the core... AND it won't stop the next Muslim attack.
Posted on Wednesday, November 17, 2010 2:27:19 PM by markomalley
(CNSNews.com) - Transportation Security Administration Chief John S. Pistole told a Senate committee yesterday that air passengers selected by the TSA for enhanced screening who decline to undergo either a full-body scan or a full body pat down will not be allowed to board planes in the United States.
There will be no exceptions, Pistole said, even for people who cite religious reasons for refusing to undergo the scan or pat down.
The definitive statement came at the conclusion of a nearly three-minute exchange on the question between Pistole and Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) in a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security Committee.
“Either the imaging or the pat down, let’s just say I don’t want either of them, because of religious reasons, what happens to me?” Ensign asked at the end of the exchange.
“So, while I respect and we respect that person's belief, that person's not going to get on an airplane,” Pistole replied.
“There will be no exceptions?” asked Ensign.
“No,” said Pistole.
The question became an issue after the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) last week recommended that Muslim women who wear the hijab not to submit to full body pat downs when going through pre-boarding security checks at airports.
----------------------------------------------------------- Seams pretty clear to me.
A) The question was asked because of the political pressure to do so.
B) I wouldn’t be so quick to believe anyone in this regime if I were you.
This may be of interest to you...
The question became an issue after the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) last week recommended that Muslim women who wear the hijab not to submit to full body pat downs when going through pre-boarding security checks at airports.
Can you point us to some examples of the times in the last two years that this administration has stood up to CAIR?
Why stop with the last two years???
Sure. But I guess that means you agree. This regime will not stand up to CAIR.
When was this TSA New Yorker issue released?
May 26, 2008
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.