Have you the ability to see that all you ever have to use against me is personal invective, while you hide passive-aggressively behind your "child" and "Cheers!" stuff?
By your definition a troll is someone who doesn't like your lies, yet you are free to write silly, pouting, personal posts--while you have said NOTHING about the actual ISSUE.
Cheers, you frightened, emotional child who's here for personal silliness instead of discussing issues.
Rather the opposite: taking your word for it that you have come around on Palin, linking to posts which back up your claim, and including those I originally *PING*ed on the topic, is neither personal invective nor passive-agressive.
"Child" is in lieu of more inflammatory language, samples of which can be seen in some of your more recent posts to me.
"Cheers!" is something I close the majority of my posts with, and have done so for years.
By your definition a troll is someone who doesn't like your lies, yet you are free to write silly, pouting, personal posts--while you have said NOTHING about the actual ISSUE.
I covered that, too, when I posted a couple of articles I *wrote* here on FR within two weeks of Palin's nomination to the GOP ticket. These articles covered the ISSUE of Palin's likely appeal.
Cheers, you frightened, emotional child who's here for personal silliness instead of discussing issues.
...hit a nerve, did I?
Slainte!.