Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stop_fascism
"What did the studio do to Red River?"

I'm not sure if you've seen it so I'll give you the basics assuming that you have not seen it. Wayne's character was an A**hole! I thought it was the best performance he ever gave honestly. But the character and his son (Montgomery Clift) were at each others throat the entire movie. At the end of the movie they got into a fight and they basically had a smile and hug feel good moment at the end. My understanding is that Clift's character was suppose to kill Wayne's character. The studio didn't want Wayne dying and they sure didn't want movie goers seeing him as a villain so they had this radical personality change at the end. I like to say that the movie suddenly turned into McLintock! at the end.

50 posted on 11/13/2010 9:58:09 AM PST by Artemis Webb (I support Nancy Pelosi for Minority Leader!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Artemis Webb

Wasn’t the studio that changed the ending, it was Howard Hawks. He never liked the idea of his characters getting killed at the end. As his career went on, he got more into the characters and less what the plot “should” have determined.

I like the ending of Red River because it defuses all the phoney hate between the two. It’s actually a very advanced narrative idea. By the time Hawks got to Rio Lobo, though, he’d completely lost interest in coherent storytelling. But as late as El Dorado, he was making terrific movies.


200 posted on 11/13/2010 10:21:04 PM PST by Darkwolf377 ( Mm, your tears are so yummy and sweet!Oh, the tears of unfathomable sadness! Mm-yummy! --E. Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson