Every case that comes before a court needs to have the same standard for “standing” as they try to apply to these cases.
A case can’t win on the merits (as determined by a judge before even hearing any of the case on its merits)? Then it can’t be heard on the merits.
The person has only a theoretical injury? Can’t be heard. That means that there can’t be any stays such as in Arizona, because nobody has suffered any REAL injury until the ARizona enforcement law has been followed. If this argument was anything but crap there would be no chance for a court to issue a stay of any kind.
We need to copy these arguments and throw them in the faces of anybody who tries to get any kind of case heard in the federal courts. If they’re gonna pull this sh!t they’re going to eat it and smell it forever, until they take it back, with apologies.
I am livid.
That's a brilliant point. I wonder if we could get some patriot legal organization to take up that banner.
Or at least write up an article for American Thinker to get the ball rolling.