Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sola Veritas

“It boils down to the concept that neither law nor courts can change the constitution....only ammendments. The original meaning of the constitution stands until ammended.”


See post #5

I wrote: “...he draws a distinction between “Natural Law” (”creator” endowed) and Positive Law (man Made)”

“Natural Law” (”creator” endowed) is — unalienable — and supersedes Positive Law (man Made)which IS alienable!

I do not see how even an amendment can remove a NATURAL —unalienable — right... a right based on natural law.

PS; I use the phrase “a right based on natural law” in the sense that a “Natural Born Citizen” has the “natural right” to run for President Of The United States — providing he meets the other requirements of age etc.

STE=Q


9 posted on 11/04/2010 9:16:39 PM PDT by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: STE=Q

NBC is here..lol..

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2620065/posts?q=1&;page=1


18 posted on 11/05/2010 5:28:22 AM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: STE=Q
Jedi Pauly wrote the most sexist article on the subject I have seen thus far. I doubt Jedi has even read any of the laws on citizenship written at the time which makes Jedi's claims that much more offensive.

I use the phrase “a right based on natural law” in the sense that a “Natural Born Citizen” has the “natural right” to run for President Of The United States — providing he meets the other requirements of age etc.

Under natural law, a female is under the tuition of the father until she marries. Until then, she is a member of the society in in which her father is a member of. On the day she marries, she leaves the father & joins the society of her husband whom she is now under the protection of.

In the eyes of the law, the two become one” Justice James Wilson, 1st US Supreme Court

In natural law, no one has a quote, “RIGHT” to citizenship. They have a choice at the coming of age what society they choose to align themselves too. Until a child is of age, that child is the “subject” of the parents because it can not speak for itself. The child owes obedience to the parents & the society in which the parents are members AND the laws of nature dictate the parents owe protection to the child during until it reaches the age of reason that is set by the positive laws of the society. In America, at the time of the founding, it was 21. Sure, the child may have been considered a member of the local society in which the parents were members of, but politically, it was the child's choice to make upon emancipation form the parents. Take that which he naturally was connected to through blood or travel and find another. It is all based on the consent of the individual.

Period, end of lesson. No rights involved, it is as the Law of Nature and of Nature's God intended it to be. There is no right, but there is a choice.

26 posted on 11/05/2010 9:20:34 AM PDT by patlin (Ignorance is Bliss for those who choose to wear rose colored glasses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson