Posted on 11/04/2010 8:14:26 AM PDT by connor_in
"San Francisco has become the first major U.S. city to pass a law that cracks down on the popular practice of giving away free toys with unhealthy restaurant meals for children." I saw the attached article on Drudge and had been hearing it on the TV and radio reports and it just got me thinking. All these bations of liberalism want to do things like ban trans fats, tax sugary drinks, ban the Happy Meal because they believe in the Nanny State and they know what is best for you...HOWEVER, these same people want to legalize marijuana and want to keep abortion legal because the government can't interfere with the right of privacy and what a person can do with/to their own body. How does any of that make sense?
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
EASY FIX! Just rename them ‘GAY MEALS’ only a ‘homophobes’ would ban them then!! ;-)
What’re they gonna do when they get the munchies?
I really hope that the last remaining McDonald’s in San Francisco do something like this.
progressive libtards
is this not a bill of attainder?
Maybe McDonalds’ needs to introduce hash brownies into their ‘Happy Meals’ as a ‘vegetable’.
They are anti-breeder in San Fransicko. But if you are going to have kids, they cannot be happy. The BLT community has a trademark on the word gay these days.
Weed IS San Francisco’s Happy Meal.
Trans Fats Down at McDonald's, Burger King and Wendy's
Does mcdonalds really have 0 grams trans fat?
And anyway, who knows. Trans fat might turn out to be like global warming: a hoax.
“EASY FIX! Just rename them GAY MEALS only a homophobes would ban them then!! ;-)”
Remember when Gay meant Happy...
In liberal land everything that is right is wrong and everything that is wrong is right.
Do the liberals really not understand why they become the butt of jokes?
The jokes write themselves as a very very liberal San Francisco group of elected officials decide that it’s in the public interest to ban Happy Meals.
To these very very liberal officials, it makes perfect sense and ties in with their liberal ideology. To most people, it’s an absurdity. To the liberal, they can’t understand why anyone would object to banning the Happy Meal.
Eat fudge
This is nanny state crap run amok. Making it illegal to give a child a toy erects a barrier to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
That's why it's called a “happy” meal.
FUSF
They want to ban the things that ordinary people like and legalize the things that liberal elitists like.
Because abortion and pot don’t contain harmful trans fats and salt? ~sarc
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.