Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama has no natural born right to be President. He is a squatter occupying the White House
A New Dictionary of the English language ^ | 1836 | James Richardson

Posted on 11/02/2010 6:06:02 PM PDT by bushpilot1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: bushpilot1
Are you saying that Americans of non-European descent are less than American? Honestly? You think that will fly with the Constitution and American law, the concept of equality under the law, the natural rights of man?

Based upon, not law, but a law dictionary?

Honestly?

You are actually suggesting race be used as a criteria for who is an American or not?

Wow. It takes all kinds I guess.

41 posted on 11/03/2010 5:01:06 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

“every of their Children and Posterity, which shall happen to be born within the Limitts thereof”


42 posted on 11/03/2010 5:04:08 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

You are bringing race into this discussion..you have nothing else to bring.

My intent is the meaning of natural. I have shown the history of natural and how the word originated.

It clearly shows descent. The naturels are those born in a country of parents who are its citizens.

The 1797 Vattel translation is not necessary.


43 posted on 11/03/2010 5:10:13 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
There is that nasty word ancestors again..to grow out of kind. Photobucket
44 posted on 11/03/2010 5:20:45 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
You brought race into it. I responded to YOU opining that “It is possible the Founders limited the President to the descendents of the White Europeans who formed the country”.

It is possible, but they never said so. There is no mention of race in the Constitution other than “Indians not taxed” and that was for purposes of apportionment and had to do with their political allegiance. Indians who were taxed were counted as full Americans.

Your suggestion that those of non-European descent are less than full Americans is disgusting, and counter to the American ideal.

Of all the asinine arguments to make to render 0bama ineligible, that one has to absolutely take the cake as the most ludicrous, racist, bigoted, small minded, and absolutely COUNTERPRODUCTIVE one yet.

Way to convince people that the birther argument isn't just because 0bama is black. I thought the lefties who were saying that were absolutely off their nut, or just going with the lazy ‘the right = racist’ meme they put out there.

And here you are making that exact argument. WOW!

IBTZ!!!

45 posted on 11/03/2010 5:24:54 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Dude, I'd hate to think we have to be Anglo-Saxons to be President.

I realize that's not what you're saying (I certainly hope it isn't).

But that's what a lot of people -- some stupid, others not -- will take away from the talk of kith and kin and kindred and kind.

Time to reboot.

46 posted on 11/03/2010 5:30:36 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
And 0bama is by right of birth and descent, the lawful and rightful native kin of Dick Cheney; an eighth cousin to be exact.

Just by simple mathematics we are all related one to the other. Go back about 20 generations..500 to 600 years and 2 to the 20th becomes a very large number indeed. What with explorations, slavery, and intermarriage it is really likely that somewhere along the line we have common ancestors.IMHO

47 posted on 11/03/2010 5:32:38 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Ad hominem


48 posted on 11/03/2010 5:39:48 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Biologically the evidence of common descent of all humans is incontrovertible.

But cousin marriage curtails the 2 to the n’th power after too many generations. People do marry cousins. Back when few people left their home villages it was inevitable to marry at least a distant cousin. But yes the group still keeps growing larger and larger.

As a consequence of this, anyone alive long enough ago and who had enough children who had children is basically the “father” or “mother” of an entire population group.

And yes, 0bama is the eighth cousin of Cheney. He does have American roots and is of 1/2 American descent. Only by bringing race into it does he suddenly become not an American by “kinship” or whatever.

49 posted on 11/03/2010 5:40:23 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Posting your own words back to you is not an ad hominem.

How about you explain yourself, if you can. I have a feeling though that if you properly explain yourself I truly will be .......IBTZ!

So how about you defend your own words, or eat your words.

I didn't bring race into it. You did.

I find you saying that I brought race into it to be a despicable lie (as well as a pitiful attempt at a dodge). Do you like to lie? Is lying how you think you are going to make your way in this world or get out of defending your own words?

50 posted on 11/03/2010 5:43:32 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Posting your own words back to you is not an ad hominem.

How about you explain yourself, if you can. I have a feeling though that if you properly explain yourself I truly will be .......IBTZ!

So how about you defend your own words, or eat your words.

I didn't bring race into it. You did.

I find you saying that I brought race into it to be a despicable lie (as well as a pitiful attempt at a dodge). Do you like to lie? Is lying how you think you are going to make your way in this world or get out of defending your own words?

51 posted on 11/03/2010 5:43:33 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Kind..natural..belonging by right of birth..descent..kinship..family..implanted by nature.

This is why the Founders and Vattel used the word natural and naturels.

natural means descent..kinship..family..belonging by right of birth.

A natural born citizen is born from citizen parents. Obama is not Kind.


52 posted on 11/03/2010 5:50:43 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Completely beside the point. The Founders used the term “natural born citizen” based upon English law that also recognized as “natural born subjects” those born “ju solis”. 0bama is of an American family, he is cousins to Dick Cheney, he belongs to America by right of birth in Hawaii, he also has an American mother. A natural born citizen is one who is born a citizen. Obama is a descendant of America, he is of our “Kind”, unless you are defining “Kind” as “White”, I notice you capitalize both.

But again, completely beside the point............

Do you think the Presidency is or should be limited to those of European descent? Do you think those who are not the descendants of Europeans born in the US are not American as the law dictionary you lovingly reference says?

53 posted on 11/03/2010 5:57:24 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Photobucket
54 posted on 11/03/2010 6:05:03 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
So you CONFIRM that it is ALL ABOUT RACE to you!

Do you also go by the “one drop” rule? Because being half white obviously isn't enough. How about an octaroon?

Wow.

IBTZ!

55 posted on 11/03/2010 6:11:09 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

The Sheridan dictionary was publish in 1780.


56 posted on 11/03/2010 6:11:32 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Do you think the Presidency is or should be limited to those of WHITE European descent? Do you think those who are not the descendants of Europeans born in the US are not American as the law dictionary you lovingly reference says?

I was speaking of the law dictionary from 1929 or whatever where you insisted that only the WHITE (gotta cap it) descendants of the European settlers were actually American.

So you keep dodging and weaving. You must agree with me that if you actually bothered to explain yourself honestly I would be .....................IBTZ!!!!!

Your argument is that he shouldn't be president because

He isn't one of our kind. He isn't White.

57 posted on 11/03/2010 6:15:06 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1
Can Obama say he has kindred blood with the Founders..with..the majority of United States citizens?

You have really pushed the "bloodline" argument to the point of absurdity. You're seriously suggesting we limit presidential candidates to descendants of white Europeans? (You do realize the "White House" refers strictly to the paint on the building and not the occupants?)

Alan Grayson is a perfectly acceptable presidential candidate in your eyes, but Herman Cain or Allen West lack the proper bloodline to be eligible in the weird world of bushpilot1?

You've crossed over into some bizarre world where racial purity trumps conservative ideals. You should stick to copying and pasting the words of others...you get into trouble when you write your own material.

58 posted on 11/03/2010 8:37:33 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Can Obama say he has kindred blood with the Founders..with..the majority of United States citizens?


What’s more “bloodline American” than having a parent who was born in Kansas to Irish immigrant ancestors.

“It’s an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth, however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage; but in general, place is the most certain criterion; IT IS WHAT APPLIES IN THE UNITED STATES; it will therefore be unnecessary to examine any other.”—Congressman James Madison, Framer, 4th President of the United States, from the floor of the House of Representatives, 1789.


59 posted on 11/03/2010 9:05:31 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

“Tiny Irish village is the latest place to claim Obama as its own.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201551.html


60 posted on 11/03/2010 9:23:09 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson