Posted on 10/25/2010 8:54:13 AM PDT by maggief
Our latest interview with the White House Insider reveals a Democratic Party civil war, with growing opposition to the Obama White House.
Author’s Note: This interview took place for nearly two hours over the weekend at the office of the White House Insider. We wish to extend our gratitude for their making time to meet with us despite an extremely demanding schedule. The information contained in this interview is among the most in depth and fascinating to date, and due to the extent of information, will come in two installments. Here is installment one:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsflavor.com ...
What little substance that's there sounds authentic in that all of this has been in the news for quite some time. It's the "interview" that doesn't seem authentic. Too much fluff and not enough substance. It's merely what we've all thought but had no real evidence.
I think we concluded he paid a visit to the Kenyan embassy because of the comment made in my tagline. That, or he needed to score at hit. Oh, to be a fly in the limo...
There is another installment of this drama posted this morning on FR. Quidam is really being eloquent than his former work during the Clinton Administration!
Do you have the thread title? I’d like to read it.
Is this Quidam redux (for those Freepers that have been around for more than a decade)? When are the men in gray suits going to sit Obama down for a talk?
_____________________
I thought they were called back in the day, “the black angels of death?”
Didn’t slick willy hint Hillary will run in 2016?
Look for a dem to rise from moderacy stardom and bash Obama
and fake that they will fix the democrats to the center of the road and not to the left in the ditch; yet they will remain in the ditch and move to the back of the bus.
IIRC, Frank Davis was once part of or did business with Broadway Bank so this all goes way back.
So, evidently the “scandal” mentioned earlier is the Chicago corruption—Reszko, Blagojevitch, etc.—which we already know about. The Dem congress has been protecting Obama, but will not be able to do so after the lose control of the committees and the agenda.
Also, the Dem party as a whole has been protecting Obama, including Mayor Daley’s Chicago Mafia. They threw Blago to the wolves, but put up a protective fence around Obama. And Fitz was always part of the Dem mob, as the Scooter Libby business so clearly showed. That could change, too, if they decide that their boy Obama is more of a weight around their necks than a help. He couldn’t even get them the Olympics.
Nothing new. Just take the lid off all the old crimes, which we already knew about even before Obama was elected—”we” being those who were paying attention.
We knew this would be down the road but it's here sooner than many expected. His handlers better be on their toes or he'll take them down with him. Count on it, Biden will be sitting in the Oval Office before this term is finished.
” Just take the lid off all the old crimes, which we already knew about even before Obama was elected—”we” being those who were paying attention “
Yep
Yep, that’s fascinating.
Of all the things HB was speculating on, somewhat incredibly, it seems that the birther thingie — in some permutation, probably the one HB posits — is the only one that has big enough repercussions to do in The O-Man.
For that to have the requisite DOJ/Chicago connection, maybe one could look at that bit about the woman in Obama’s law firm who said (or wrote an article, I can’t remember) that his citizenship was going to become an issue if he ran for President.
Maybe there was a coverup begun at that time and somehow Holder, pre-DOJ, was involved in it?
Just throwing stuff out there.
If I didn’t know it was anonymous and some asked me to read it and guess who was being interviewed, I would have guessed Rahm too.
” Math is math. And Obama’s Rezko-money number math went from $50,000 to $250,000 in one interview. And, he claimed that FBI mole was “not accurate” about him, Obama, having had frequent meetings with Rezko. “
It is probably twice this much.
On second thought: It sure sounds like Rahm but I think when the first series of these articles came out Rahm was still in the WH and I believe the insider stated in the first interview that they had been gone for a month or so???
I initially thought one of the economic advisors. Who knows though?
UPDATE!
Could the Black Panthers, Voter Fraud, and other illegal Obama 2008 actions be the BIG SCANDAL the “White House Insider” was talking about?
Never misunderestimate the guys at the buzz.
Come on - a few more words would be nice...
Could be.
I think you're right - but can you expand on this a little... thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.