Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ma.AG Candidate Jim McKenna:"I pledge I won’t work to change same-sex marriage and abortion laws."
baywindows.com ^ | 10/22/2010 | n/a

Posted on 10/22/2010 7:18:57 PM PDT by massmike

Despite his "personal opinions," Republican candidate for Attorney General Jim McKenna says he won’t go after same-sex marriage, DOMA challenge if elected.

The former Worcester County Assistant District Attorney said that despite "personal views," he does not intend to challenge LGBT civil rights in Massachusetts. "We’ve all had the chance to see Massachusetts with same-sex marriage as an option. My opinion is five years later we are the same Massachusetts," he said. "I am just another guy trying to do what is right in this world, and yes, of course I have my own personal views.

As a lawyer and a professor of ethics, I know that the rule of law is bigger than any of our personal views. I know I will uphold our laws with fairness and objectivity as your next Attorney General. And I pledge I won’t work to change the law when it comes to social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion."

(Excerpt) Read more at baywindows.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; elections; homosexualagenda; jimmckenna; massachusetts; prolife

1 posted on 10/22/2010 7:19:01 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike
Now coming from a paper like Bay Windows,I'm REALLY skeptical about this...seeing as how deeply in bed with the gay lobby Martha (Marcia) Coakley is....

Anyone else have different info?

2 posted on 10/22/2010 7:21:45 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

This DID come from MassResistance,though...

ATTORNEY GENERAL

D -*MARTHA COAKLEY, Medford
R - JIM MCKENNA, Millbury
Martha Coakley is a hardcore anti-family pro-gay activist, and uses the Attorney General’s office to push her favorite leftwing causes. Here’s our report on Coakley when she was running against Scott Brown for US Senate. Jim McKenna impressed everyone by getting 27,000 write-in votes to get on the ballot. (The ineptitude of the Republican party not fielding a candidate is astounding.) He got the backing of many pro-family groups, but now he’s started to go soft. This past week he was on the front page of the homosexual newspaper Bay Windows telling them, “I pledge I won’t work to change the law when it comes to social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion.”

Nevertheless, McKenna is still a much better choice than Coakley. But don’t look for anything heroic from him.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/govt10/election10/general/statewide.html


3 posted on 10/22/2010 7:23:05 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The Republican candidate for Governor is also big on gay rights


4 posted on 10/22/2010 7:31:38 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: massmike; Lonesome in Massachussets; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...
Martha Coakley is a hardcore anti-family pro-gay activist, and uses the Attorney General's office to push her favorite leftwing causes.
Thanks massmike, that is the thing to remember; baby steps, baby steps.


5 posted on 10/22/2010 7:40:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massmike
The Attorney General of a State isn't supposed to pursue his or her own agenda. That person is to work FOR MA on the legal issues of the Commonwealth..

In order to make any changes about homosexual marriage, or abortion, in MA, the citizens have to work through the legislature, even though the members can be duplicitous, at times, as they were when we were trying to get a referendum on marriage on the ballot.

6 posted on 10/22/2010 8:53:22 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Then it was totally unneccesary brown-nosing (bad choice of words given the subject,I know...) for him to even say, "...And I pledge I won’t work to change the law when it comes to social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion."

It just sickens me how so many politicians-even the ones supposedly on "our" side-feel they have to kiss-up to these people.

7 posted on 10/22/2010 9:28:39 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Yeah, I guess he felt like he had to say something like that to bring in more ‘Independent’ voters. Sad.


8 posted on 10/22/2010 10:20:50 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: massmike

It would still be so poetic if Coakley could bite the dust in yet another election. It would be the supreme repudiation of her leftism.


9 posted on 10/23/2010 5:28:19 AM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Republicans and Democrats used to want to get on the cover of The Boston Pilot, now they trip over Social Conservatives to get on Bay Window. Besides, why is he being asked this? Only the legislature can change laws.


10 posted on 10/26/2010 2:02:05 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

...and EVERYONE has forgotten THIS point:

“...There is no actual “law” involved. The 2003 Goodridge ruling was just a court case. In fact, in Massachusetts the state constitution has never allowed a court to change the law. Thus, the actual marriage statutes have not changed at all, despite bills every year before the Legislature to attempt to change the marriage laws to allow same-sex “marriage”.”
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/govt10/election10/mckenna_doma/index.html

Confirmed Today: Gay Marriage STILL Not Legal in Mass.!

“For years now — since 2005 — the homosexual lobby has filed and refiled its bill to legalize “gay marriage” in Massachusetts. They know that the law as it now stands refers to “man/woman”, “husband/wife” relationships as marriage. Today, the Judiciary Committee once again sent the bill to “study” — meaning, they killed it. But the very existence of this bill over the years confirms that we are correct that “gay marriage” has never been made legal in Massachusetts.”
http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/03/confirmed-today-gay-marriage-still-not.html?zx=f2d6491e1ef8051e


11 posted on 10/26/2010 2:11:15 PM PDT by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson