[conimbricenses]

I’ve done nothing more than comment factually on her extensively documented habit of falsifying her resume. That habit speaks directly to her character and the picture that emerges is not a pleasant one. It is nonetheless a truthful one of which we must all be cognizant, and your pattern of willfully ignoring the evidence because you happen to be infatuated with her does a disservice to the truth.

[fortheDeclaration]

What you have done is post information that has been dealt with by her already.

You are making moral judgments without context, jumping to conclusions about her veracity without actually knowing all the details or hearing her side.

And again, these issues were addressed weeks ago.

You are beating a dead horse.

[fortheDeclaration]

I’ve done nothing more than comment factually on her extensively documented habit of falsifying her resume. That habit speaks directly to her character and the picture that emerges is not a pleasant one. It is nonetheless a truthful one of which we must all be cognizant, and your pattern of willfully ignoring the evidence because you happen to be infatuated with her does a disservice to the truth.

So, you are urging voters in Del to vote for Coons?

If you are, you are choosing a Communist over a Constitutionalists based on subjective opinions on her character.

If not, then your posts are simply nothing more then hot air.

Which is it?