You are making moral judgments without context, jumping to conclusions about her veracity without actually knowing all the details or hearing her side.
And again, these issues were addressed weeks ago.
You are beating a dead horse.
What you have done is post information that has been dealt with by her already.
Except it hasn't, because to you "dealt with" = ignored and/or distorted, much as you attempted to do with the Oxford issue.
It really is a simple matter - either she claimed a certificate FROM Oxford or she did not. And either she graduated from Farleigh-Dickinson in 1993 or she did not. There is no in between. There is no partial credit awarded from a "similar" program that happened to be renting space AT Oxford. And there is no diploma-in-waiting that's yours while caught up on a bureaucratic snag for 17 years, as NONE of that justifies her claiming things that she did not have.
And that makes her a liar, much like you.