To answer your questions, first, all forces are mediated by particle exchanges.
The photon is the mediator particle for electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental forces and evidently significant to our physical cognition.
However, the graviton is the mediator particle for gravity, also one of the four fundamental forces. Gluons are the mediator particles for the strong atomic force. Electrically charged W-bosons and electrically neutral Z-bosons are the mediator particles for the weak atomic force.
Having said all that, my interest is in geometric physics rather than particle physics.
To me, a particle is like a placemarker in a wave. Here's an interesting article on the difference in our perceptions of reality: Particles versus Waves
Mystics sometimes refer to it as the universal now.
All realms and realities are the Creation of God Almighty, even spiritual realms. All realms and realities have spatio-temporal expressions, albeit the continua of these other realms are very different from our simple 'present fixed' realm. To cut to the chase, even a thought exists in some spatio-temporal continua, we just haven't found the nature of that realm though we have clues that our 4D realm effects changes and transitions in/of that realm. When Jesus knew what was in the mind of His accusers, He also knew to which where/when He would step in order to 'pass through them' when they took up stones to kill Him for recealing He is I Am come in the flesh.
Do any of you know . . .
in my rampant collecting of puzzle pieces related to Bible prophecy and the End Times . . . as well as UFO technologies stuff . . .
I’ve come across a few times serious scientist types—physicist, cosmology types—and I’m NOT including the New Agey mystic types here . . . but hard science types
who . . . privy to the deceptive inputs from the fallen angels/ET’s/nephilium critters . . .
have asserted that all this tangible stuff we construe as real . . .
isn’t.
My eyes have tended to glass over at that point and I rush on by . . . I can’t even recall what exactly they were alluding to . . . as if there was an exactly there.
I think the most I can liken where they seem to be coming from is . . .
that all this cosmos is something equivalent to our 1’s & 0’s in some vast computer.
I think they are full of . . . something . . . other than truth but I was wondering if any of you have come across such assertions in your readings.
I think there’s even been an assertion that Einstein came to the conclusion that none of this is real.
. . . whatever real means at that point . . .
I guess the movie that came closest was The Matrix.
On a different . . . track . . . somewhat . . .
There are very persistent assertions that the basic physics that is taught in all the better universities is very significantly flawed and inaccurate, WRONG.
Certainly the purported limit to traveling faster than the speed of light is the one thing that is purportedly quite wrong.
And there are repeated assertions that the unified field theory was worked out a long time ago and that Einstein was privy to it.
Then there’s lots of assertions about gravity this’s and that’s which I raced on by, too.
My very fuzzy memory on those items is that gravity is a whole lot more manipulatable than the old standard model would allow for.
Thanks for the link to the essay. Indeed, what else can the devious ‘mind’ do besides handle wave/particle duality???