BINGO!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2133568/posts
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Comments?
I've been saying exactly this since the BC was brought up as an issue. The BC is nothing but a red herring and the real issue is staring everyone right in the face. Mr. Obama's father was in fact a British subject which by definition makes Mr. Obama other then a "natural born" citizen. All other issues (birth certificate, certificate of live birth, adoption by step father and move to Indonesia, passport data, social security numbers, draft registration, &c, &c) are moot.
Regards,
GtG
Regards,
GtG
I have always thought that the father’s citizenship was the way to go as to Obama’s eligibility. However, I also have believed that there is birth information that, if known, could be just as damaging. My disappointment is that the two features have never been joined to show a more compelling argument as to why in total, the eligibility issue was appropriate for full discovery. I realize one is based on known and admitted facts, while the other is based on a need for facts. Lakin will have to decide if his recourse is only one path. It seems the Obama people are trying very hard to muddy the situation by use of the Wong Kim Arc decision; but interesting is that one supporter of that tact has given reasons of the decision that go to the father’s citizenship.I also have a hunch that the smart operatives in this matter such as Rahm Immanual, Axalrod, and others are/will be leaving knowing the chase is getting hot and leaving the quenching to enablers such as Pelosi,et.al. plus Soros.
Except, that you have to prove who his real father actually was, which may open the door to access to his long form birth certificate.
BINGO!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2133568/posts
Thank you, I have been saying the same thing for two years now.
He (Obama) has been hiding the important FACT in plain sight. Figures were too stupid and ignorant to see. You inherit your name, titles, lands and sovereign allegiance from your FATHER. Many other countries see it the same way, an example is germany.
Thanks again
That is exactly what I think. The Birth Certificate is a smoke screen. It’s his Heritage which makes him ineligible.
Not entirely. If The Won was born outside the US, that too, would make him not a natural born citizen, and would be much less controversial than having the Supreme Court rule on the "foreign father", or "Natural Born" vs. "native born" issue. Even for most of Oh's staunchest supporters would not argue that a person born outside the US of a foreign citizen father, was a Natural Born citizen. Especially one that did not even qualify as a citizen at birth under the law as it existed at that time.
So it need not be either reason A or reason B, it can be both, but either is sufficient.
Except the most expedient way to prove O. Sr. is the legal birth father is by presenting the original BC. As it is now, we only have his word that Sr. is his father. Short of digging up Davis or Malcolm X or Stanley and doing a DNA test, we have to take Ann's and typical white granny's word on the BC. You are correct that the SSN, draft reg, etc. has nothing to do with this case, though I'd love to see him brought up on separate charges for those. However, adoption by Lolo, passport history, and possible citizenship changes might be needed if it turns out that Sr. isn't listed on the real BC.
Also, if he was born outside the US, Ann was too young to bestow US citizenship on him. Again, we have to go back to whomever the orginal BC states is the legal father and his citizenship. Every avenue eventually leads back to the vault copy.