When the government breaks a law, what can the normal everyday citizen do about it?
Kerchner is military. How could it be possible that military personnel would not have standing to sue the government for not giving them a lawful CINC?
People keep saying that the election was certified by Congress, but it wasn’t. Not legally. The law concerning how that was required to be done was not fulfilled. Congress did NOT give the US military members a lawful CINC, and Kerchner and any other military personnel should certainly have standing to sue.
If the line the judges were told to take is that McCain or Palin are the only people who would have “standing”, then McCain’s shushing of Palin takes on a whole different level of significance, and John McCain should be answering some very, very pointed questions.
If the line the judges were told to follow was to deny standing to anybody but McCain, then McCain is the critical person to the success of their plan. There are only a few people who would have to be threatened into submitting to the communist coup. Maybe they already knew McCain would never challenge. When the run on the bank happened, who exactly did McCain hear from about what was going on? He suspended his campaign to go back to DC. I would dearly love to see who all talked to him privately during that time.
When the government breaks a law, what can the normal everyday citizen do about it?
Kerchner is military. How could it be possible that military personnel would not have standing to sue the government for not giving them a lawful CINC?
People keep saying that the election was certified by Congress, but it wasn’t. Not legally. The law concerning how that was required to be done was not fulfilled. Congress did NOT give the US military members a lawful CINC, and Kerchner and any other military personnel should certainly have standing to sue.
If the line the judges were told to take is that McCain or Palin are the only people who would have “standing”, then McCain’s shushing of Palin takes on a whole different level of significance, and John McCain should be answering some very, very pointed questions.
If the line the judges were told to follow was to deny standing to anybody but McCain, then McCain is the critical person to the success of their plan. There are only a few people who would have to be threatened into submitting to the communist coup. Maybe they already knew McCain would never challenge. When the run on the bank happened, who exactly did McCain hear from about what was going on? He suspended his campaign to go back to DC. I would dearly love to see who all talked to him privately during that time.
Active duty members of the military are in the worst possible position to challenge the Commander-in-Chief due to the military chain of command.
Again, it didn’t have to be John McCain. Sarah Palin could have made a strong case for standing as the person who could become president in the event of infirmity or death of an aging Republican presidential candidate. Also the Republican National Committee on behalf of nearly 60 million average citizens who voted Republican could make a strong case for legal standing. The minute the election was held, Sarah Palin was a free entity, free to choose her own path. The Governor doesn’t strike me as a woman who is easily “shushed.” I believe that Governor Palin could have become a national conservative heroine (even more than she already is) by agreeing to become the lead plaintiff (along with scores of average citizens) in Obama eligibility class action lawsuits.
Standing is irrelevant on the criminal justice side of the judicial system. When laws of the land are broken by governmental officials, that is a crime, not the stuff of civil lawsuits. The chief election official in each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia is the person responsible for insuring that only eligible candidates appear on the ballot. In most states, that official is the Secretary of State.