[butterdezillion]

I think I’m still waiting for you to give me names of prosecuting attorneys who would pursue this.

[jamese777]

I think I’m still waiting for you to give me names of prosecuting attorneys who would pursue this.

---

I guess you missed my earlier posts on other threads stating who I would present evidence to:
1) Patrick Fitzgerald: US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois who just got a conviction and provided the evidence for the impeachment and removal of Obama’s buddy, Governor Rod Blagojevich.
2) Virginia’s conservative and Tea Party endorsed state Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli who has already expressed doubts about Obama’s eligibility.
3) Mark Shurtleff, the Republican Attorney General of Utah.
4) Lawrence Wasden, the Republican Attorney General of Idaho.
5) Daniel S. Sullivan, the Republican Attorney General of Alaska.
6) Troy King, the Republican Attorney General of Alabama.
7) Henry McMaster, the Republican Attorney General of South Carolina

The above are just to name a few but the MOST IMPORTANT THING is to interest a conservative, constitutional law firm in presenting evidence to any of the prosecutors above. Attorneys General pay attention to other lawyers who are admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. Less than 1% of the attorneys in the nation are admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States’ bar.

The conservative constitutional law firms that would get a prosecuting attorney’s attention to look at evidence for a possible grand jury investigation would include:
The Center for Individual Rights
The Washington Legal Foundation
The American Center for Law and Justice
The Landmark Legal Foundation
Judicial Watch
The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
The Institute for Justice
The Pacific Legal Foundation
The Alliance Defense Fund