Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LorenC

Sorry, that is not sunlight. That is likely TV lights kept at the campaign headquarters. Those are outside windows. There are no interior windows like that in the open landscape area of the Chicago Headquarters.

If you want to see what this area looks like it daylight and sunshine simply go to this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6-FHxPy0E0

In fact go to the 1:08 mark of the video. You will see vertical window coverings (maybe blinds) over Alexrod’s shoulder. This matches the vertical structures over the windows in the photo. In the video it is also clear how bright the area is during daylight due to the large outside windows. The dark background in the photo would be impossible if the light source were ‘the sun’.

The photos from Fact Check just make no sense. As others have noted they are not at all professional, and as noted here they were not even likely taken at the same time.

Since we are back to these infamous photos who’s supposed owners will not talk. Here is another thing that the video above helped with. If all of these photos were taken in in the Chicago HQ it was a puzzle as to the place where the ones with wood grain were taken. There is almost no wood grain surfaces in the Chicago HQ. Neither in the open landscape or in the offices (thanks Katie for the tour - it was helpful!). But I said ‘almost’. Look at the video exact at the 3:00 mark. In the press area in the back is the only wood grain surface in the whole video of Obama’s HQ. If those picture were taken in a 7 minute sequence then that surface is the likely place where the close-ups with wood grain were taken.

I thought someone said those photos were taken at someones office. If that office is not at Obama HQ that would be impossible if the original EXIF data was correct in terms of the photo to photo timing. Remember, Henig and Miller have claimed that the camera merely had the wrong date and time in it. But the EXIF data indicated the whole shoot lasted around 7 minutes - start to finish.

I am impressed that you took the time to repeat the sequence and see what is clearly visible with some very simple enhancement. The bottom line - these ‘photos’ would get ripped to shreds in the court of law.


177 posted on 09/24/2010 2:20:32 PM PDT by bluecat6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6

And that’s why it’s so significant that the judges are all refusing to let the case be heard on its merits, and why it’s so heinous that we have no prosecuting attorneys who will investigate.

If the normal protocols, rules, laws, etc were followed this would have been over a long, long time ago. What we’re looking at here is the failure of our government, media, and law enforcement systems - and that should be a serious concern for anybody, regardless of what they think about the eligibility issue.

Thanks for the information you’ve given. You’ve obviously put in some valuable time on this, and I appreciate your sharing that.


179 posted on 09/24/2010 5:31:49 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson