1) Anonymous Person #2, “TsunamiGeno,” says that “supporting documentation” and “certified copies” weren’t available to the public. He says nothing about mere photocopies not being allowed.
2) The P&E person specifically says there was an area where you could make digital images.
3) The fact that the P&E person got an image, whether by scan or by photo, shows that “TsunamiGeno” could have too.
4) Again, who actually told you that the public can’t photocopy index data? Are you basing that conclusion entirely upon “TsunamiGeno”?
5) Lest we lose track of the larger point, my original observation was:
“An anonymous blogger supposedly retained the services of a second anonymous person, who then made an unevidenced trip to Hawaii on an unspecified date six months ago, during which time was made an astounding discovery that the second anonymous person failed to make any record of (e.g., a simple photocopy of the index page where “Obama” would fall alphabetically), which the first anonymous person failed to report to anyone for six months (despite writing about said supposed trip way back in May).”
Even if we grant the as-yet-unproven-and-seemingly-contradicted assertion that photocopies aren’t allowed, then that changes the above to the oh-so-radically-different:
“An anonymous blogger supposedly retained the services of a second anonymous person, who then made an unevidenced trip to Hawaii on an unspecified date six months ago, during which time was made an astounding discovery that the second anonymous person failed to make any record of (e.g., a simple cell phone snapshot), which the first anonymous person failed to report to anyone for six months (despite writing about said supposed trip way back in May).”
It’s gone from second-hand, undocumented, delayed, anonymous hearsay to, well, second-hand, undocumented, delayed, anonymous hearsay. Ooooo...*so* much more persuasive.
Loren.... EVERYTHING on the internet is hearsay. Including Obama’s Fact Check COLB.
This is why B is looking to increase interest enough to get someone to pick up the story who is either in Law or big in the press.
NOT talking about this, is = to accepting fraud and an unconstitutional POTUS. Even the POSSIBILITY of POTUS being illegitimate ought to be investigated IMMEDIATELY instead of mocked.
These aren’t little light issues. There is SIGNIFICANT reason to believe Obama is hiding something. Mostly because he refuses to take the simple easy out and end the controversy by releasing a LEGITIMATE copy of his Birth Documents.
Instead, Hawaii is changing its rule with no legal authority. It is deliberately breaking it’s own laws.
Explain off THAT reality.
For somebody who thinks Obama’s Factcheck COLB is fine and dandy you’re mighty sarcastic about “second-hand, undocumented, delayed, anonymous hearsay”
I smell a double-standard from a mile away, LorenC, the anonymous poster.
I know ladysforest and I have no doubt that her source is reliable.
And I can see with my eyes that the image on P&E is a photo. TsunamiGeno did not get a photo of the record. The worker said he could not have “a copy”. Make of that what you will.
If everything is as you say, why is the HDOH refusing to release the birth index? Why are they specifically lying about not having my request for the computer-generated 1961 birth index, which was received by e-mail on July 29 and by snail-mail on Aug 4th?
Why are they doing this? You tell me.