They’re only supposed to be able to ignore me if I ask for something I’ve already asked for before.
But then, Onaka and the AG office have ignored every communication I’ve ever made to their office for the past year, so I guess that tells me how much “stuff” happens in the government offices there anyway. lol
And the HDOH sent my money back on Day 7 after my only request for the computer-generated 1961 birth index, saying I had missed a 20-day deadline. I’m getting into their heads so bad they imagine me sending requests before I even actually do. lol.
They’ve got until this Friday to show me my request for the computer-generated 1961 birth index, including the date they received it in their office. We’ll see if they send it. The only request I sent was in their office with the money order prepayment at 6:02AM on Aug 4th, and the day they sent my money back (supposedly because I had missed a 20-business-day deadline to fulfill my obligations for that request) was on Aug 13 - the 7th business day after I made my request.
On August 7th - 4 days after my request and payment was in their office - the AP printed an article quoting Janice Okubo as saying they offer the computer-generated 1961 birth index for $98.75 but hadn’t received any money for it yet and were asking the AG if they could stop offering it.
Mark Niesse told me that his interview with Janice Okubo for that article was done during the business day on Aug 4th. My request and money was in their office before the work day began on Aug 4th.
So there we have it in the public record that Okubo said they were still offering that record AFTER my request and money was in their office.
Now they’re trying to back out. A person can’t help but wonder why. And whether Okubo could be charged with false advertising in that article, or something. lol
I forget if it was one of your requests or from one of the stories where Spokesbabe Okubo was interviewed (or both), but she said something about the requests were getting creative to try to get to the information about Obama's birth records and that's how they were treating most of the requests. We also know they were tracking who and where requests are coming from so they can 'identify' VRs.