Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

The ruling that MissTickly received indicated that those records were part of Obama’s vital records, which is what prompted my questions.


411 posted on 09/14/2010 8:09:44 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

Right. Joesting confirmed that understanding.

I think she was pressured to reach that conclusion - since name change amendments to BC’s are not confidential according to several OIP Opinion Letters. If records of amendments were vital records themselves those OIP Opinion Letters would not have concluded what they did.

I also think she was pressured to tell me that the HDOH gets to decide what they release and what they don’t. That’s such a clear violation of UIPA’s whole reason for establishing the OIP.

Again, shenanigans that make me go Hmmmm.


423 posted on 09/14/2010 8:47:23 AM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson