Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lincoln And The Death Of The Constitution
Wolves of Liberty ^ | 9/7/2010 | gjmerits

Posted on 09/07/2010 12:43:35 PM PDT by gjmerits

The Gettysburg speech was at once the shortest and the most famous oration in American history...the highest emotion reduced to a few poetical phrases. Lincoln himself never even remotely approached it. It is genuinely stupendous. But let us not forget that it is poetry, not logic; beauty, not sense. Think of the argument in it. Put it into the cold words of everyday. The doctrine is simply this: that the Union soldiers who died at Gettysburg sacrificed their lives to the cause of self-determination - that government of the people, by the people, for the people, should not perish from the earth. It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union soldiers in the battle actually fought against self-determination; it was the Confederates who fought for the right of their people to govern themselves.

(Excerpt) Read more at wolvesofliberty.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Politics
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; lincoln; sicsempertyrannis; statesrights; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 901-904 next last
To: trumandogz
It would seem that the Confederates only fought for the white folks in their country.

Even more narrowly, the Confederate aim was only for the benefit of SOME of the white folks, only the ones who owned slaves and had power and wealth. The poor folks were despised cannon fodder. The book "Bitterly Divided" by Professor David Williams shines the light on the Confederate war against their so-called "own people" both black and white.

101 posted on 09/07/2010 5:25:11 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
The President of the United States does not take an oath to help the "country" to "survive." He takes an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. Any state has the right to secede. EVERY state had the DUTY to secede the moment Roe v. Wade was handed up, and the President failed to guarantee that the Executive Branch would refuse to enforce it against the states.

I despise the Roe decision also, but if we don't have the sentiment of the nation enough to overturn it within the Constitution, there is no way that a secession over the issue could be carried to success. The problem is with the ttitudes of the people, not the Constitution.

102 posted on 09/07/2010 5:34:41 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

ttitudes=attitudes


103 posted on 09/07/2010 5:36:26 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: semantic

The path was set by Hamilton before the ink even dried on the Constitution. Men of evil intent desire wealth and power over their fellows. Period. The problem has always been how to check them. The Constitution clearly did not.
And there you have it. While some might enjoy fishing, others golf, and many simply wanting to get together with friends & family for a little football, there is a very small number who seek only to amass power over others.

We may wish to believe this isn’t so, that all people have some type of inherent goodness and sociability, but it’s a lie. The most obvious of these psychopaths are common criminals, yet the same strain runs through others more crafty & cunning.

While patriots were still fighting the British for independence, you can be assured that some were already gaming potential outcomes. As the poster above noted, Hamilton already had it all figured out before the ink was even dry.

Lincoln may have been acting under what he believed were noble pretenses; so to Confederates. However, it mattered not a whit to those who were hedged regardless of the outcome(s).

The bottom line is that the Constitution was simply not up to the job. We now find ourselves in a situation beyond belief, where a criminal syndicate is openly acting against the citizens.”

Well said. I have nothing to add.


104 posted on 09/07/2010 5:42:29 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
The book "Bitterly Divided" by Professor David Williams shines the light on the Confederate war against their so-called "own people" both black and white.

This is disproven by your boy, Sherman:

Dear Brother:.....It is about time the North understood the truth. That the entire South, man, woman and child are against us, armed and determined. It will call for a million men for several years to put them down. They are more confident than ever, none seem to doubt their independence, but some hope to conquer the northwest. My opinion is there never can be peace and we must fight it out.

105 posted on 09/07/2010 5:43:12 PM PDT by Idabilly ("When injustice becomes law....Resistance becomes DUTY !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Idabilly

Actions speak louder than words and Sherman’s actions made my ancestors’ part of the South safer.


106 posted on 09/07/2010 5:56:45 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bravedog; An.American.Expatriate

Ping


107 posted on 09/07/2010 6:05:44 PM PDT by Idabilly ("When injustice becomes law....Resistance becomes DUTY !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise
You can say the “Civil War” was about slavery all you like but the fact remains Nether the Union soldiers nor Lincoln himself had any intention of ending slavery as the objective the war.

The Civil War is about slavery because the preservation and extension of slavery is why the South chose to start the war.

108 posted on 09/07/2010 6:09:18 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Any state has the right to secede
No state has the authority to secede unilaterally.
109 posted on 09/07/2010 6:11:29 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

“Their slaves weren’t men or people so of course they couldn’t govern themselves, right?”

“Their” slaves were considered no differently than the slaves in the north...and those that were in the South as states of the Union. Your comment is devoid of logic and has no relevance.


110 posted on 09/07/2010 6:14:51 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Triple
Why do you think that point is pertinent? Didn't you read the first speech? Don't you know when the states seceded? How does the Emancipation Proclamation fit in?

You are all over the place.

111 posted on 09/07/2010 6:16:14 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

“For what it’s worth, attempting to leave the Union when a national election doesn’t go the way you want doesn’t sound like a core democratic principle to many.”

It’s not a core principle of democracy...it’s a core principle of freedom.


112 posted on 09/07/2010 6:17:33 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Personally, I don't think that my great-great-great-grandmother, who lost her ancestral home and her brothers' furniture business to Sherman's pyromaniacs, was exceptionally dangerous.

But if you feel threatened by a sixteen-year-old girl who was only four feet eight inches tall, I'm not sure there is much I can do for you.

113 posted on 09/07/2010 6:21:13 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Put your trust in God; but mind to keep your powder dry. - Oliver Cromwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

I never suspected your great great great grandmother as being the Confederate who murdered my Southern ancestor in Northwest Georgia.


114 posted on 09/07/2010 6:26:13 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Idabilly; central_va
If you have an opportunity to get to Perryville, Kentucky before the end of October, they have a fascinating temporary exhibit on two of Kentucky's finest cavalry officers; John Buford and John Hunt Morgan.

Part of the exhibit is the Henry repeating rifle that Buford carried at Gettysburg. It has been in his family's private possession since his death in December 1863 and was temporarily loaned to the museum for this exhibit.

115 posted on 09/07/2010 6:27:32 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Put your trust in God; but mind to keep your powder dry. - Oliver Cromwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Materially, they started from scratch.

Materially, they raided federal armories. Very few home-made cannon saw action at First Bull Run.

116 posted on 09/07/2010 6:31:28 PM PDT by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jdege
No state has the authority to secede unilaterally.

Which state has authority to deny secession?

117 posted on 09/07/2010 6:31:31 PM PDT by southernsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
Sorry for the knee-jerk reaction.

The temporary exhibit at the Perryville Battlefield Museum I mentioned to some others in comment #115 also has a detailed look at the guerilla fighting that took place here in Kentucky, including a pistol carried by "Sue Mundy", the infamous Confederate guerilla.

A number of these outlaws did not fight for either side of the war, but merely used it as an excuse to rob, pillage, and murder.

118 posted on 09/07/2010 6:34:58 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Put your trust in God; but mind to keep your powder dry. - Oliver Cromwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Patrick1

“I’m with Lincoln. You use your authority which he had to keep the Union together. You don’t allow a few rich gentry to destroy the greatest promise on earth because they wanted to keep a dying economic system based on an immoral trade in human beings.”

What is that “greatest promise on earth” if it is not the right of men to govern themselves, rather then be governed by distant governments that disregard the limits of their own constitution.

Lincoln himself destroyed that promise, it doesn’t matter. He saved the union bey distorting everything it stood for. he freed the slaves by enslaving everyone else to perpetual union with their lawless government.


119 posted on 09/07/2010 6:35:43 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

Most the men who fought for both sides who brave men who honorably did what their conscience told them. But both sides had their bad element. And both bad elements tended to make themselves scarce when real fighting was to be done.


120 posted on 09/07/2010 6:40:06 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 901-904 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson