Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lori Garver's Small Vision of the Next Fifty Years in Space
Associated Content ^ | September 5th, 2010 | Mark R. Whittington

Posted on 09/05/2010 11:13:31 AM PDT by Marcus

Recently NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver made a speech to the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics on what she termed "the next fifty years in space." The address was primarily a defense of the controversial Obama space policy.

Beyond some of the soaring rhetoric and some good, but vague wordage about the roles of commercial space and NASA, one could not help but notice how tinny and small the Garver, which is to say the Obama, vision of the next fifty years in space really is.

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: lorigarver; nasa; spaceexploratiom

1 posted on 09/05/2010 11:13:35 AM PDT by Marcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marcus

It’s sounds like it’s going to take NASA a long time to help the muzzies build up their self-esteem.


2 posted on 09/05/2010 11:15:57 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Hanoi Boi" Kerry tops wealthiest lawmakers at $188.6 million! "Berthers" Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus
The author nails it right here:

Or is it something more sinister? Perhaps the President and his people so disdain American exceptionalism and power that they will avoid anything, at all cost, that would tend to enhance both. The asteroids and Mars are scheduled so far in the future that one cannot trust this administration to be serious about either."

3 posted on 09/05/2010 11:19:57 AM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus
Lori Garver is a vapid, vacuous space groupie who should have been relegated to being an events coordinator for a student space group, which is where she started.

And should have stayed.

4 posted on 09/05/2010 11:26:17 AM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out!! The Americans are On the March!! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
There's some truth to that.

But it's more grungy, filthy and low rent then even a political motive like that.

The truth is, for decades the low lifes have been screaming that any money spent on space exploration or science should have been spent on welfare: more booze money for the garbage of society.

That's what it's really about with the occupant of the White Hut. He just wants more walkin' around money for his bro's.

5 posted on 09/05/2010 11:31:00 AM PDT by Regulator (Watch Out!! The Americans are On the March!! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Absolutely true.


6 posted on 09/05/2010 11:37:00 AM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

space ping


7 posted on 09/05/2010 11:38:17 AM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
The truth is, for decades the low lifes have been screaming that any money spent on space exploration or science should have been spent on welfare: more booze money for the garbage of society. That's what it's really about with the occupant of the White Hut. He just wants more walkin' around money for his bro's.

So, what you are saying is that with OBAMA as President, we have reached the pinnacle of the "ME" Generation?

8 posted on 09/05/2010 12:01:41 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill informed post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

When the progenitor-elect John F. Kennedy said, “we will”, he meant NOW! How is it that the National Aeronautical and Space Administration (an American institution, not meant for global rent), has come to a lowly position, speaking of “50 years down the road, we should be able to ...”.

The small-minded, Muslim-based Obama Administration, with no true knowledge or care for what has made America great and why, cannot have dreams that run counter to the so-called doggerel called Muslim fundamentalism, which can be summed up as “If Mohammed wanted us to fly, the horses would have wings”. This is directly opposed to Classical thinking, because the Greeks believed that there was the possibility that some horses did have wings!


9 posted on 09/05/2010 12:37:03 PM PDT by Prussianone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus
"...And even if we find no indigenous Martians, as our first astronaut shakes the red soil from her boots, she will prove once and for all that humans are meant to explore."

Ah, so it has to be politically correct space exploration. No doubt she will shake the red soil from her space burqa too.

10 posted on 09/05/2010 12:44:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marcus

Like the Clinton’s refocus of NASA to a social program, the absolute lack of any commercial gain or capitalistic endeavor is telling.
Making a profit in space, making it commercially viable for private industry, would allow people to escape the controls of the state.

Fascists hate that.


11 posted on 09/05/2010 12:57:02 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic
The U.S. space program turned into a politically correct social program long before Clinton got into the White House. If you have any question about that, just go back and look at how much focus NASA put on the diversity of the crew in the 1986 Challenger disaster.

Then go back and look at the crews for the first half-dozen or so missions after the program was re-started in 1988 and the shuttle program was re-prioritized to get a backlog of military payloads up into orbit. Those crews were almost exclusively white men.

12 posted on 09/05/2010 1:53:21 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If you have any question about that, just go back and look at how much focus NASA put on the diversity of the crew in the 1986 Challenger disaster.

By early 1986, the space program had gone for nineteen years without a fatality. The people at NASA had gotten complacent and were regarding the shuttle as just another space bus. They went another seventeen years until the loss of Columbia.

13 posted on 09/05/2010 2:08:19 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reg45
Right. And look at that Columbia crew, too.
14 posted on 09/05/2010 2:38:55 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis; HighWheeler; ChuckHam; Elderberry; ColdOne; Tolkien; ...
No Comment..


15 posted on 09/05/2010 7:15:23 PM PDT by KevinDavis (President Obama: The Crybaby in Chief...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prussianone

“Muslim fundamentalism, which can be summed up as “If Mohammed wanted us to fly, the horses would have wings”

More correctly stated would be: if Allah (the koran) had wanted us to fly, the horses would have wings, but Mohammed said (in the hadiths and sunnahs) it is ok to cut them off.

Which is why horses no longer fly.


16 posted on 09/06/2010 3:40:50 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
It’s sounds like it’s going to take NASA a long time to help the muzzies build up their self-esteem.

ROTFLMAO

17 posted on 09/06/2010 9:38:22 AM PDT by GOPJ (BE the change you wish to see.... Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; ...
The address was primarily a defense of the controversial Obama space policy.
She sucked before, and hasn't improved with age. Zero has no vision of his own, not even his dismantling of the Constitution and US sovereignty and establishment of the world caliphate -- but this "Obama space policy" is her vision, and it better termed "Obama non-space policy". There's nothing controversial about it, either -- it sucks. Thanks KD.


18 posted on 09/06/2010 4:24:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson