Second, no heterosexual can criticize homosexuals for sodomy if they commit sodomy themselves. And guess what sodomy is? You'd be wrong if you don't look it up.
Every Christian man I have ever dated believes heterosexual sodomy (i.e. anal or oral sex) is somehow okay while homosexual sodomy is not — and frankly, the Christians are freakier to me than gays who do not know the Lord and have no chance to even recognize their sin because they do not have the gift of the Holy Spirit to overcome.
For Christian men to blame UNSAVED GAYS for their sexual proclivities when their own house is completely out of order (porn...ahem) — is the height of hypocrisy. Especially when God assures us that He will judge the Church FIRST.
It all boils down to selfishness. Farah is WAY too stupid to understand or debate the problem of the sin of “pleasure seeking” which God hates too.
If I were Chris Barron, I'd simply ask Farah if he believes oral or anal sex is okay for heterosexuals and to define if conservatism can encompass these sodomites.
If I were Chris Barron, I'd ask Farah if conservatism can encompass “pleasure seekers” or misogynistic porn surfers.
If I were Chris Barron, I'd ask Farah if conservatism can encompass satanic Freemasons and Masons (both are abominations in Christianity.)
If I were Chris Barron, I'd also posit that there is a vast difference between the Old Testament manner of dealing with homosexuality than the New Testament, which does Joseph Farah consider more “conservative”? Stoning someone for their sin or recognizing that we all are sinners before Christ?
Farah needs be offering Barron a hand of friendship in Christ as fellow sinners in need of a savior, not castigating Barron for his sin.
But like I said, I don't believe Farah is a good enough Christian to debate this.
Betcha anything Farah mistakes Jesus as being a God of “American Family Values”
which is meaningless to Christ who said “who are my brothers, my sister, my mother? Only those who do the will of my Father in heaven” as well as “”If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father, mother, wife, children, brothers, and sisters, as well as his own life, he can't be My disciple.”
So basically, again, if I were Chris Barron, I'd just ask: does conservatism encompass true Christianity which is not about American Family Values at all — but rather a crucifixion of self and all that the world holds dear?
On a lighter note, if I were Joseph Farah, I'd ask Chris Barron who thought up the ridiculous moniker for Ann Coulter that she is the "right wing Judy Garland"? (still confused over that one.)
Second, no heterosexual can criticize homosexuals for sodomy if they commit sodomy themselves. And guess what sodomy is? You'd be wrong if you don't look it up.
As to your first point, Farah may be an idiot -really, this is irrelevant in regard to the issue and is but a judgment of Farah -Christianity does not rise or fall with the performance of Farah, you, or myself. An idiot not able to defend the principles and basis premising the Constitution says nothing as to the legitimacy of the Constitution...
Your second point tends to negate your first -regardless, two wrongs do not make a right. Further, the criminalization of sodomy is not the issue here -the promotion of it in society, the push for its acceptance, and special rights premised in an activity is the issue here...
As to your sex life -just as irrelevant as the homosexual sex life when it comes to conservative principles...
you d not have to be a Christian to think homosexuality is wrong.
Actually most I know do not even go to church and think of homosexuals as disgusting sick people.
It’s certainly not natural otherwise nature would have intended two of the same sex to reproduce, they cannot therefore it is unnatural.
She did.
Ann Coulter to headline Homocon party for gay conservatives next month in New York City
“Of course I’ll do it,” Coulter wrote to GOProud when they asked her to join the event. “I’m the right-wing Judy Garland!”
So who were you before you were zotted?