[Non-Sequitur]

If the changes are moot, then why make the changes?

The military is a bureaucracy like any other, and they make decisions on their own schedule and nobody else's. Have you read the changes? I have, they're linked to off a blog that deals with military legal matters. They're fairly innocuous and I don't see anything in them that might impact Lakin. Click on the link below and scroll to the entry titled "2010 MCM Amendments."

Link

[Artemis Webb]

If one reads your post #25 and compares it to my post #26 they will find that you are the reasoned and logical troll. Whereas I am the sarcastic smartass troll.

[Velveeta]

According to the National Institute of Military Justice linked with this thread, the text of the changes have not been posted. The changes to which you’re referring are a part of the covering document.

I understood that to mean that the covering document is like a summary - but nobody in the public yet knows the text of the changes.

[Beckwith]

I don't see anything in them that might impact Lakin.

If the EO specifically targeted Lakin by using his name, rank and horsepower, you would still say, "I don't see anything in them that might impact Lakin."

You are predictable.