Skip to comments.
New body scanners at San Diego Airport / Lindbergh Field show passengers' parts
examiner.com ^
| Sept. 1, 2010
| Réne Girard
Posted on 09/02/2010 10:18:20 AM PDT by jackspyder
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
article's link to youtube video is even more revealing
To: jackspyder
Voyers?!?! Is there any such thing as professional journalism anymore?
2
posted on
09/02/2010 10:20:05 AM PDT
by
SpinnerWebb
(In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
To: jackspyder
More like Rape-scan Systems.
3
posted on
09/02/2010 10:20:12 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Titus 2:13)
To: jackspyder
These images are definitely pornography, for which I am a willing consumer, but an unwilling subject.
4
posted on
09/02/2010 10:20:16 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: jackspyder
think of all the kids and teens being scanned
these images are going to start showing up as pedophile trading cards
5
posted on
09/02/2010 10:20:54 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
To: jackspyder
More money (that must be stolen or borrowed) is spent.
6
posted on
09/02/2010 10:21:02 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: jackspyder
Who cares? My parts are pretty much the same design as anyone elses.
7
posted on
09/02/2010 10:22:28 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: jackspyder
I like to go through several times as I have an extra large ummm, err, ahem... “package” and I want the male TSA dorks to be jealous. And some of the female TSA ask for my phone number. A few want to do a pat down search.
8
posted on
09/02/2010 10:23:07 AM PDT
by
Drango
(NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
To: jackspyder
Frankly, I don’t care if people see my ‘junk’. It’s all original, has a few miles on it, but has been well taken care of. Sure, age has taken it’s toll - but after seeing a couple 100,000 of these a week - if that’s what it takes to give a person his jollies - so be it.
I know that I cannot smuggle some C4 in my underwear, and neither can the Arab male between the ages of 18 and 34. If this ‘exposure’ keeps Muslims as a whole off the aircraft - well, that’s another added bonus.
Pesonally, I’d like to see the seats in the aircraft covered in pig leather. It’s relatively inexpensive, it wears well and no Muslim wants to be contaminated with any swine by-product before heading off to his 72 Raisens.
9
posted on
09/02/2010 10:23:07 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
To: jackspyder
the scanners clearly display a person’s parts through his/her clothes: arms, legs, belly rolls, breasts?....
Jelly rolls?.....Oh...never mind!...
To: SpinnerWebb
Voyers?!?! Is there any such thing as professional journalism anymore? <>P>Probably not, but this is from examiner.com which appears to be more of an internet blog.
11
posted on
09/02/2010 10:24:50 AM PDT
by
Fundamentally Fair
(Bush: Mission Accomplished. Obama: Commission Accomplished.)
To: jackspyder
To: Fundamentally Fair
Probably not, but this is from examiner.com which appears to be more of an internet blog. But, at least they can get their html right!
13
posted on
09/02/2010 10:25:37 AM PDT
by
Fundamentally Fair
(Bush: Mission Accomplished. Obama: Commission Accomplished.)
To: jackspyder
Yes, I would argue that my thing should be private. Someone give this reporter a Pulitzer.
To: jackspyder
Totally unnecessary to be doing disgusting things like this
15
posted on
09/02/2010 10:27:45 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: Owl_Eagle
These images are definitely pornography, for which I am a willing consumer, but an unwilling subject. I have nothing to worry about from these things since nobody really wants to see flabby old engineer naked. They'll be doing their best to avert their eyes when I pass through the scanner.
16
posted on
09/02/2010 10:28:39 AM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: jackspyder
17
posted on
09/02/2010 10:31:39 AM PDT
by
Dstorm
(Palin 2012)
To: jackspyder
"Rapiscan Systems"
I wonder how much money the owners have donated to the rats?.....otherwise, this crap would not be going on....
18
posted on
09/02/2010 10:31:56 AM PDT
by
cherry
To: The_Victor
its not about the flabby old engineers or men in general....its that the images of our young girls or women will be published by the scum that govt agencies sometimes hire.....
this is totally obscene and if they would just PROFILE I wouldn't mind but that is not polically correct....
people do not realize how invasive govt has become....
I'll bet that the rich and famous don't have to go thru this...
19
posted on
09/02/2010 10:36:09 AM PDT
by
cherry
To: jackspyder
TSA asks, :Whatcha packin'?"
20
posted on
09/02/2010 10:43:15 AM PDT
by
Young Werther
("Quae cum ita sunt" Since these things are so!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson