Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919
How would you make the case that Obama's orders aren't legitimate if you aren't allowed to pursue or present the documentation that supports your claim?

Obama didn't issue any orders to Lakin, three other superior officers did. Those are the orders Lakin is charges with disobeying. You want to somehow connect Obama with routine orders to report to a certain place at a certain time, or to report for temporary duty with another unit. Good luck with that.

The fact of the matter is, as I've said on numerous occasions, Obama could be unmasked as a fraud and removed from office tomorrow and Lakin would still be guilty of refusing to obey the orders of his superior officers and with missing movement.

63 posted on 09/02/2010 2:14:21 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

He might be guilty of following an UNLAWFUL order, but not of following a LAWFUL order, which is what they have charged him with.

I’ve shown elsewhere that a court-martial conviction based on an “even if” argument was ruled to be a violation of due process and overturned by the civilian courts.

The military knows they are violating Lakin’s due process rights by refusing him access to critical evidence on the basis of an unconstitutional “even if” rationale.

They are plenty willing to screw his due process rights. Jerkwads.


72 posted on 09/02/2010 2:36:20 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson