Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers Demand Time to Read Bills Before Voting on Them
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 9/1/2010 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 09/01/2010 7:06:53 AM PDT by MichCapCon

Two GOP state representatives say they are routinely asked to vote on bills that they haven't had a chance to read, a practice they say they want to stop.

Reps. Justin Amash, R-Cascade, and Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills, co-sponsored a joint resolution requiring a 72-hour review period before any bill can be put up for a vote.

"It happens all the time," said Rep. Dave Agema, R-Grandville, of the policy of quick votes with no time to read the legislation. "Everybody is looking at themselves and thinking, 'What in the world is this?' "

The bill requiring a three-day waiting period comes in the wake of the passing of House Bill 5872 last week, which involved allocating $312 million of the federal stimulus plan.

Amash said the Democrat-controlled House introduced the bill and then substituted a different version of it on the floor that was eight pages. The bill passed 90-14 Aug. 25. Agema, Amash and McMillin all voted "no."

"They threw it up and gave us no time to read it," Amash said...

(Excerpt) Read more at michigancapitolconfidential.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: bills; congress; michigan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: MrB
Let’s make them wait the same amount of time that we have to wait to buy a handgun.

After all, legislation does far more damage than a law abiding citizen buying a handgun can do.

I just thought that should be said again.

21 posted on 09/01/2010 7:40:57 AM PDT by magslinger (DISCLAIMER: No liberals were harmed in the making of this post. I'm sorry and will try harder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
IMHO, ANY bill that has even one (1) Rep that states "he/she didn't read it entirely themselves" should be struck down as unconstitutional because it does not represent fair representation of "the people".

I'll go further and state that any bastard that doesn't read the bill entirely should be, at the least, tarred and feathered; preferbally hung as a traitor to the Constitution. /henry bowman rant

22 posted on 09/01/2010 8:10:31 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (FORGET the lawyers...first kill the "journalists". (Die Ritter der Kokosnuss))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Who do they think they are?

Members of the State Duma only need to be able to raise their hands and say “Da”.

Reading should not be necessary.


23 posted on 09/01/2010 8:17:09 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Is it just me, or does it sound just a little STRANGE to be forced to BEG for time to read bills???


24 posted on 09/01/2010 8:46:07 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

What an astonishing concept: public debate by our elected officials with respect to the full text of the bills being debated.

What’s the news headlines lately? The people need to be re-educated about legislation that has been passed.

Oh, but didn’t Empress Pelosi state: “You have to pass it to find out what’s in it.”

The 1099 issue, for example, buried deep in the ObamaCare legislation, woudn’t have been a sockdolagers jack-in-the-box suprise.

Same thing with respect to Obama’s withholding tax-cut; the fundamental tax-liability wasn’t reduced though. How many Obama-droids were happy with their April tax due this year? How the media trumpeted workers taking home more money each week. Not a peep about the tax tables not being changed. Guess what happens next year? The lowest tax bracket was raised from 10% to 15%. What do you think the deal is for those in some other bracket than the lowest tax bracket?

Oh, no! That’s NOT a 50% tax increase, that’s only 5 pennies per dollar. Look, you make 10,000 whole dollars per year, you can afford an extra $500 tax (you filthy stinkin’ rich money-grubbin’ bastiges). This is only a minor re-write of Two Penny-Jenny’s scheme. Forget the $200,000 soak-the-rich income threshold proclaimed by the media. The new definition of ‘rich’ is anybody with any income whatsoever.


25 posted on 09/01/2010 8:52:34 AM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68
“The Laws passed by Congress should be written in language that the average HighSchool graduate should be able to understand.
They use purposefully obtuse language to build loopholes...”

I'm sure judges will love trying to figure out the intent of bills written in Ebonics and piglatin.

26 posted on 09/01/2010 10:09:04 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I’ll do you one better. We need a Constitutional Amendment that says no piece of legislation shall be longer than The Constitution.


27 posted on 09/01/2010 2:48:47 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

I also think that any piece of legislation except tax cuts must have an expiration of 10 years. If it is a good law, then it can be extended for 10 more years. If it is a really good law then it can be extended indefinitely.


28 posted on 09/01/2010 6:34:04 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson