Posted on 08/28/2010 8:27:45 PM PDT by abigail2
After turning NYC over to the Islamists and leftist sympathizers, via endorsing their 9/11 Victory Mosque (any Muslim project called The Cordoba Initiative has to be just that), Dictator-in-Chief Obama believes that he has found the way to both destroy opposition to his Orwellian plans for the former United States of America and introduce OUR countrys final demise.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Come on folks. This article is over the top. If it were a post on FR there would be a “tin foil hat” sign on it.
First, Obama citing the AZ SB1070 law in his report on Human Rights is not the same as hauling Arizona in front of the U.N. This is an infantile analysis.
Secondly, even if it were an invitation for the U.N. to start action against Arizona during October there would be NO political gain to be made. If that were the case, the Democrats would lose closer to 150 seats in the House.
Get real and worry about actual threats.
Glenn Beck proved that today.
I don’t know anymore than what you are reading, however they are a pretty reliable site.
This has shown up since the 23rd. Previous posts & links to other posts:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2577886/posts
Thanks for posting this abigail2. Sher Zieve is one of our favorite reads.
It is over the top. The fact that an “American President” would even mention this like its dirty laundry is equally over the top.
Trying to rally international opinion to shore up an untenable federal position in clear defiance of national mandimus to the contrary is way, way over the top, dude.
satire?
well the terrorists won. they got NYC..nice job libs.
I will believe it when I see it.
Same here. 0bama would like to, but he won’t.
FUBO!!!
I agree with your analysis. However, the writer of this article makes it sound like U.N. troops will be marching on Arizona sometime in October. That is nonsense.
yes it would but I dont think the democrat party can provide one.
Set a benchmark for yourself. What would Obama have to do for you to recognize that he is seeking the fall of the US?If you can delineate one monumental act of treason then...watch for it.
Correct. But we need to stand at the walls and be prepared to blow the trumpet as your screen name suggests!
Previous post:
This story has been reported since Aug 23 (as far as I can find) in Washington Post. Both the Townhall & Post stories leave out some interesting details found on AIP (Americas Independent Party) website. Major detail is that our country will be subjected to humiliating hearing by the UN on Nov 5. Instructive to see variations in the story.
AIP News (Amer Ind Party) via Free Republic
The presidents first-ever report on U.S. human rights to the UN Human Rights Council contains a rich vein of offensive material. So far, one aspect has not been reported: our petty president used the situation to bash Arizonas immigration law and possibly transfer jurisdiction over the law from Arizona to the UN. Throughout the report, which sounds like an Obama campaign speech, the president discusses the original flaw of the U.S. Constitution, Americas tolerance for slavery, and his version of our long and despicable history of discriminating against and oppressing minorities, women, homosexuals, and the handicapped. After each complaint, he addresses how he is delivering us from ourselves, patting himself on the back for such initiatives as ending torture, promoting Affirmative Action, and passing health care legislation.
In his section on Values and Immigration, he praised the Department of Homeland Securitys efforts to provide better medical care for detainees and increase Alternatives To Detention (e.g., letting them go). Then he turned to the one state that has had the temerity to stand in his way of fundamentally transforming the American electorate:
The national report is but the first step of the international governments review process. On November 5, the United States will be examined by a troika of UN bureaucrats from France, Japan, and Cameroon (an oppressive nation which is a member of the Organization of Islamic Conference). This trio will consider three items: Obamas self-flagellating report, reports written about America by UN tribunals or international governing bodies, and testimony from NGOs with a pronounced anti-American bias. It will also consider voluntary pledges and commitments made by the State, such as suspending an Arizona state law.
Then the French, Japanese, and Cameroon diplomats will draw up a plan of action for the United States to implement.
http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=16411&posts=1&start=1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/23/AR2010082303880.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100823/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_us_un_rights_1
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2576982/posts
Go ahead and try you communist pig.
If this isn’t treason, what is? I’m about to lose my mind over this constant assault against us as individuals and to our country!
Sorry, I'm one of the knuckle-dragging neanderthals who frequent this site.
I'd appreciate if you could explain-- and please consider our deficient mental capacity-- how "citing the AZ SB1070 law in his report on Human Rights is not the same as hauling Arizona in front of the U.N."
And also, please explain why it is any of their Goddamn business.
Enlighten us.
Many thanks.
"The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to review by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional, Brewer wrote."
Brewer blasts Obama over submission to UN specifying AZ immigration law
This is probably where itll all end up:
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
Could you imagine the boxcutter sanctioning the use if the largest muslim based military on American soil?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.