To: DJ MacWoW
No. It protects their abuser from the law. Oh but you will find no end of Freepers using any pretext - even the word of God - to attack age of consent laws.
Witness the debate on this thread.
Shatering the age of consent obstacle is a common goal among the libertarian crowd since Ayn Rand gave the movement it's hippie hedonist makeover.
21 posted on
08/27/2010 2:59:36 PM PDT by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: MrEdd
Yes. I’ve seen the idiocy. While the denial crowd claims that if homosexuals get “special rights” there’s no chance that NAMBLA will petition to lower the age of consent. I don’t know if they’re stupid or lib trolls.
23 posted on
08/27/2010 3:04:39 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
To: MrEdd
27 posted on
08/27/2010 3:12:45 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: MrEdd
Shatering the age of consent obstacle is a common goal among the libertarian crowd since Ayn Rand gave the movement it's hippie hedonist makeover.
It's funny because I used to make that exact same point with the libertine crowd years ago on FR. Most would get all up in arms over age of consent laws, saying that of course Libertarians were in favor of them! But a few honest ones admitted that, in order for them to remain consistent, they had to say that the state had no right to control when a person was sexually an adult.
Once you get libertines to start talking like that, the inherent absurdity of their ideology becomes apparent.
49 posted on
08/27/2010 8:39:44 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(It's a degenerate society where dogs have more legal rights than unborn babies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson