Skip to comments.
Gov't Has Legal Right To Track You Via GPS
Creative Minority Report ^
| 8/26/2010
| Patrick Archibold
Posted on 08/26/2010 7:06:00 PM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: markomalley
And so it seems it is also legal for everyone. Want to know where to find your treasonous ‘Critters and Sin-ators, plant a GPS on their car and find them when you want to.
2
posted on
08/26/2010 7:13:30 PM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(Osama and Obama both hate freedom and have friends that bombed the Pentagon)
To: markomalley
And you do not have the right to prevent them from spying on you.
3
posted on
08/26/2010 7:14:51 PM PDT
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: markomalley
Simply put an I hate AZ, Rainbow sticker on your car.
They will not track other Union members.
4
posted on
08/26/2010 7:20:44 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(Communities regularly fight the construction projects, Walmarts Starbucks and even tree removal.)
To: markomalley
A business opportunity:
Plant GPS’s on LEO vehicles when parked in public areas.
Offer a site that tells members where each LEO vehicle in your city/county is!
5
posted on
08/26/2010 7:22:39 PM PDT
by
NoLibZone
(Communities regularly fight the construction projects, Walmarts Starbucks and even tree removal.)
To: markomalley
Lifehacker.com has a story on jammers for this issue.....
Legality aside they are for sale.
Jammer world is also selling such.
6
posted on
08/26/2010 7:24:32 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: markomalley
Before the left planted the communist Kagan on the bench I would have said that this is just another 9th “Circus” ruling that would get overturned; but now.......
7
posted on
08/26/2010 7:36:57 PM PDT
by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: markomalley
They could just as easily wait until you parked in a public place, and then put the device on your car.
The 4th doesn’t really address tracking or trailing someone, which is what the GPS device is doing. It doesn’t search or seize anything. It’s essentially just following someone electronically.
8
posted on
08/26/2010 7:39:21 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: stuartcr
I guess they have thrown out the term “ NO TRESPASSING “ ... because, how will they be able to enforce no trespassing laws when they can come into your own private property without your consent, place a GPS on your car, in which is private property ?
I wonder if they can be challenged in court with carjacking laws ? invasion of privacy laws ? vandalism laws ?
To: markomalley
Governments don't have rights. They have powers.
Powers that are limited by the Constitution. Powers that come from the people.
People have rights. Those rights are from God. The Constitution enumerates some of them.
/johnny
To: stuartcr
The 4th doesnt really address tracking or trailing someone, which is what the GPS device is doing. It doesnt search or seize anything. Its essentially just following someone electronically. Which hardly qualifies as being secure in your person.
11
posted on
08/26/2010 8:08:04 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(It's a time for choosing. You can have liberalism or you can have America. Pick one.)
To: stuartcr
You have it upside down.
What, in the Constitution gives the government explicit power to track anyone?
The 4th amendment is a partial enumeration of the rights of the people given by God.
If a power isn't given to government in the Constitution, they are forbidden to that power. That's why they rely on 'interstate commerce' and 'general welfare'. Two terms that are badly misused if you read the founders intent.
/johnny
To: markomalley
I see a (huge) commercial opportunity, in GPS detectors.
13
posted on
08/26/2010 8:10:19 PM PDT
by
Cringing Negativism Network
(posting handle made more sense, back before CNN became a shoe-shine stand...)
To: American Constitutionalist
They could always plant it when the car is parked in a public place.
14
posted on
08/26/2010 8:17:17 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: EternalVigilance
That’s true of course, to us. That’s the tricky part about the courts, people interpret things differently. It could probably be argued that the tracking device was for protective purposes.
15
posted on
08/26/2010 8:20:32 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: JRandomFreeper
I’m not a judge, my opinion means nothing, and I don’t like it anymore than others here. I’m just presenting a different point of view. Perhaps the tracking could be interpreted as protection? Maybe it could be considered the same as stop light cameras, only for individual vehicles and mobile. Maybe for traffic safety and control?
16
posted on
08/26/2010 8:24:32 PM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
To: stuartcr
It could probably be argued that the tracking device was for protective purposes. The Supremes have ruled that there is no obligation on government to protect any individual.
You miss the big picture. God gave people rights. People gave government limited powers.
When that government exceeds those powers, the government must be abolished or changed by the people.
/johnny
To: stuartcr
What’s the legal difference between tracking and stalking?
To: markomalley
Do they have the right to track two suspected gay men (perhaps one being a politician) into a bedroom? I thought the Supreme Court already found that what goes on in the bedroom is private.
I guess the loophole is that traveling to the bedroom is not private, but once there anything goes.
That doesn't surprise me since this is the same crew that says, crossing the border without permission is illegal, but once there, anything goes.
-PJ
19
posted on
08/26/2010 8:28:17 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
To: stuartcr
Evidently the technology already exists to (1) detect, (2) jam and/or (3) spoof GPS.
Look for those offering such products, to make windfall profits.
Detectors would tip off the subject - would be a shame if an expensive GPS tracking unit fell off and was stolen.
20
posted on
08/26/2010 8:30:10 PM PDT
by
Cringing Negativism Network
(posting handle made more sense, back before CNN became a shoe-shine stand...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson