Posted on 08/25/2010 6:46:49 AM PDT by Def Conservative
For a guy who says he plans to fight the homosexual agenda until the last breath and thinks God will collapse America for accepting gay marriage, WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah sure has been doing a lot of gay media lately.
Farah appeared on two radio shows that are hosted by gay talk show personalities this week to blast Ann Coulter for headlining an upcoming party sponsored by GOProud, an organization that represents gay conservatives.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
This is my beef with conservatism: its always losing ground, Farah told Signorile. Thats why I dont consider myself a conservative.
Birther pimping? I guess supporting the Constitution now make one a pimp. Get real.
Its a GAY radio show. He must be giving the radio show credibility then.
LOL! I think that’s obvious.
So his appearance on these shows as the voice of opposition equals Coulter being on MSM shows pushing conservatism to lib talking heads..
I didnt know that a radio show counted as being a political group?
Ann accepted being a speaker at a conference for a political group fighting for perversion rights. Farah did not.
And since Ann does not support gay marriage (and minces no words about it) she’ll be the voice of opposition at that conference.
The fact remains...its a radio network SOLELY for homosexuals...why did he legitimize it?
No. It’s a sleight of hand argument. Coulter appears on TV with libs all the time to refute them. No one has said she shouldn’t. What was stated was that she shouldn’t headline a homosexual convention.
“...Ann Coulters acceptance of speaking at this group of (so-called conservative) homosexual perverts is giving their group credence. Merely speaking on a radio show is not the same thing...”
Bingo!
Exactly.
Actually she's giving the group legitimacy by appearing. Young conservatives are all atwitter and saying this shows approval of them as a group.
The fact remains...its a radio network SOLELY for homosexuals...why did he legitimize it?
CNN is SOLELY a network for liberals. Why does Ann go there?
Speaking out against an agenda in the media, any media, is not the same as headlining a radical homosexual convention. This is not the "gotcha'!" Coulters fans wish it was.
He couldn’t BUY a respectable front, but there’s a sucker born every minute.
Exactly.
Ann has this guy’s number up one side and down the other; “Fake Christian” (and all the other self-serving, phony, opportunistic stuff that goes with it).
As has Coulter by calling the naysayers fake Christians. It's like a divorcing couple airing laundry in the press.
Their "expectations" would be moot if they weren't able to use the arm of the FEDERAL government to help them advance their agendas.
If we're to stop them, their power centers must be scattered. We (talk radio, internet, etc.) have already done that with what was formerly known as "the main-stream-media".
It is critical that we see to it that the Federal Government is shrunk to its constitutionally enumerated powers (which mostly has to do with the national defense and foreign affairs.) Most domestic powers and responsibilities belong to the individual States according to the Constitution.
So What??? Get a life —
There is difference between debating and embracing homosexual activists. Apparently, the nit wit that wrote the article can’t make that distinction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.