WND editor appears on gay-themed radio show to blast Ann Coulter for speaking to gay conservatives

Daily Caller ^

[Tex-Con-Man]

From the article...

“This is my beef with conservatism: it’s always losing ground,” Farah told Signorile. “That’s why I don’t consider myself a conservative.”

[TheBigIf]

Birther pimping? I guess supporting the Constitution now make one a pimp. Get real.

[Def Conservative]

Its a GAY radio show. He must be giving the radio show credibility then.

[Def Conservative]

LOL! I think that’s obvious.

[DJ MacWoW]

So his appearance on these shows as the voice of opposition equals Coulter being on MSM shows pushing conservatism to lib talking heads..

[TheBigIf]

I didn’t know that a radio show counted as being a political group?

Ann accepted being a speaker at a conference for a political group fighting for perversion rights. Farah did not.

[Def Conservative]

And since Ann does not support gay marriage (and minces no words about it) she’ll be the voice of opposition at that conference.

The fact remains...its a radio network SOLELY for homosexuals...why did he legitimize it?

[DJ MacWoW]

No. It’s a sleight of hand argument. Coulter appears on TV with libs all the time to refute them. No one has said she shouldn’t. What was stated was that she shouldn’t headline a homosexual convention.

[Def Conservative]

From Wikipedia- "Michelangelo Signorile (pronounced /ˌsiːnjəˈrɪlə/; born December 19, 1960) is a gay American writer and a national talk radio host whose program is aired each weekday across the United States and Canada. He is a political liberal, and covers a wide variety of political and cultural issues. Signorile is noted for his various books and articles on gay and lesbian politics, and is an outspoken supporter of gay rights" The only difference is, Coulter is speaking to a bunch of gay activists in person while Farrah spoke to one gay activist over the phone.

[Monterrosa-24]

“...Ann Coulter’s acceptance of speaking at this group of (so-called conservative) homosexual perverts is giving their group credence. Merely speaking on a radio show is not the same thing...”

Bingo!

[TheBigIf]

Exactly.

[DJ MacWoW]

she’ll be the voice of opposition at that conference.

Actually she's giving the group legitimacy by appearing. Young conservatives are all atwitter and saying this shows approval of them as a group.

The fact remains...its a radio network SOLELY for homosexuals...why did he legitimize it?

CNN is SOLELY a network for liberals. Why does Ann go there?

Speaking out against an agenda in the media, any media, is not the same as headlining a radical homosexual convention. This is not the "gotcha'!" Coulters fans wish it was.

[februus]

He couldn’t BUY a respectable front, but there’s a sucker born every minute.

[Matchett-PI]

Exactly.

Ann has this guy’s number up one side and down the other; “Fake Christian” (and all the other self-serving, phony, opportunistic stuff that goes with it).

[DJ MacWoW]

Although I generally agree with Farah, I think he has handled this badly.

As has Coulter by calling the naysayers fake Christians. It's like a divorcing couple airing laundry in the press.

[smokingfrog]

Good analogy.

[Matchett-PI]

"So if gays comprise 1-3% of the general population then conservative gays must be much less than 1% of the population. Why do liberals, gays, ecofreaks,and others expect greater power than their population numbers would indicate?"

Their "expectations" would be moot if they weren't able to use the arm of the FEDERAL government to help them advance their agendas.

If we're to stop them, their power centers must be scattered. We (talk radio, internet, etc.) have already done that with what was formerly known as "the main-stream-media".

It is critical that we see to it that the Federal Government is shrunk to its constitutionally enumerated powers (which mostly has to do with the national defense and foreign affairs.) Most domestic powers and responsibilities belong to the individual States according to the Constitution.

[Uncle Chip]

So What??? Get a life —

[Ol' Sparky]

There is difference between debating and embracing homosexual activists. Apparently, the nit wit that wrote the article can’t make that distinction.