Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There are one million and one “Reagan Republicans“¸ but where are the “Lincoln Republicans“?
JohnnyBibs ^ | Tuesday, August 24, 2010 in the year of JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY! | Daniel Benjamin Orris

Posted on 08/25/2010 5:26:17 AM PDT by JohnnyBibs

There are one million and one “Reagan Republicans“¸ but where are the “Lincoln Republicans“?

7:21 pm-est, Tuesday, August 24, 2010 in the year of JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY!

by,

Daniel Benjamin Orris of Pennsylvania

When I heard a quote this evening of a political candidate calling himself a “Reagan Republican“, I was reminded of that now common phrase used more as political subterfuge or chicanery, rather than containing any genuine meaning.

The unfortunate reality is, it seems, many otherwise Conservative voters are being deceived into supporting moderate Republicans who appeal to the Tea Party by using phrases such as “Reagan Republican“ and now near hollow planks like “smaller government“ and “less taxes“; akin to what happened in Massachusetts with the deceptive Rep. Scott Brown.

These and many other phrases and words have lost their meaning, some never even having an honest meaning to begin with.

Unfortunately, the late former President Ronald Reagan has become the go-to figure of moderate Republicans who employ the “Reagan Republican“ title in an attempt to gain popularity among Conservatives, fellow moderate Republicans and Tea Parties.

His face is seen on tee shirts, bumper stickers and an assortment of other novelty items.

Ronald Reagan was considerably the best president of the 20th Century, but in my opinion not the best Republican president.

The designation of “Best Republican President“ is reserved for the first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln.

Abraham Lincoln seems to be a forgotten figure.

The utmost of all post-founding U.S. presidents, Abraham Lincoln fought for a national end to slavery, acknowledged the Christian heritage of the U.S.A. and began a new era of civil rights that only ended when the Democrats regained control of congress almost two-decades later!

In my opinion, it seems honorable men such as Abraham Lincoln, Alexander Hamilton, Fisher Ames and even George Washington are being forgotten by Americans who choose to remember a more recent political figure, Ronald Reagan.

The term “Reagan Republican“ seems to have come to represent a moderate Republican than anything Ronald Reagan stood for.

Nevertheless, if presented with a choice, I would rather vote for a “Lincoln Republican“ than a “Reagan Republican“; even if they are both true to their name.

Without disrespecting Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln was a better president; he did more for this country.

Conservatism in the United States Of America is still a ways away from being near to that of our fore-fathers, I contribute that to the lack of genuine Conservative leadership and organizations.

Without a doubt in my mind, two of the most popular icons for Conservatives and Republicans in the U.S.A., Fox News & the Tea Party along with individual “leaders“ being Sarah Palin & Ann Coulter among others, are really destructive moderate Republicans that humiliate the party name.

However, I believe if Conservatives and Republicans in this country are gave a choice between so-called “Reagan Republicans“ and “Lincoln Republicans“ (meaning genuine Constitionalists instead of moderate Republicans), the latter will be chosen.

Sadly, it appears that the U.S.A. will have to wait at least another election year until “Lincoln Republicans“ begin to appear on a mainstream level.

As we all should, I Praise and Thank JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY LORD GOD and SAVIOR! May HE Bless these United States Of America!

Sincerely,

Daniel Benjamin Orris of Pennsylvania

11:08 pm-est, Tuesday, August 24, 2010 in the year of JESUS CHRIST ALMIGHTY!


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: lincoln; reagan; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Non-Sequitur
IMHO of course.

The Coven and humility are total strangers....

41 posted on 08/25/2010 9:36:47 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: central_va

And the Lost Cause Losers and common sense are even further estranged.


42 posted on 08/25/2010 9:57:25 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
What was the purpose of having federal troops in Charleston Harbor ?

Fort Sumter was a federal facility. The troops were manning their post.

Perhaps to protect against a sneak attack from the Spanish Armada ?

Doubtful, if for no other reason than the Spanish Armada had sailed 250 years before.

Respectfully, where are you getting your history lessons....from the National Education Association ?

Would that be worse than getting it from a variety of Southern Mythology websites, as you seem to have done?

43 posted on 08/25/2010 10:35:05 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
For the south, primarily an agricultural area, the use of slaves allowed southern farmers and plantation owners to meet the ever growing demand for more food by a growing nation and still keep prices low.

The south was barely self-sufficient in food production. The bread basket of America at that time, and the only part exporting food products in any quantity, was the midwestern states, And they seemed to do just fine without slaves.

44 posted on 08/25/2010 10:37:59 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Did you miss the part where I said that this discussion is closed?


45 posted on 08/25/2010 10:59:24 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
What was the purpose of having federal troops in Charleston Harbor ? Perhaps to protect against a sneak attack from the Spanish Armada ?

Gee, then you'd have to wonder why the South Carolinians expended so much energy to get Ft. Sumter built.

The fact is that after the War of 1812, when the British fleet was able to bombard east coast cities more or less at will, James Madison called for the construction of a series of forts up and down the entire coast. Surveying for the entire project began in 1817, and the site for Sumter was chosen in 1826. Various legal hurdles--individuals claiming ownership of the shoal--were dealt with by the South Carolina legislature, which was eager to see the fort built. Actual work began in 1828. Oh, and during that whole time, John C. Calhoun of Charleston was either Vice President or Secretary of War.

So now the question has to be asked, where did you get YOUR education on the subject?

46 posted on 08/25/2010 11:01:23 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Then feel free not to read or reply anymore. But this is a public forum and you don’t get to simply announce a subject closed.


47 posted on 08/25/2010 11:03:21 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

That’s all well and good.

But neither you nor non-sequiter answered the question. Why was the Lincoln government so intent on manning the Fort AFTER they were asked to leave ?


48 posted on 08/25/2010 11:52:05 AM PDT by colonel mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
I'm asking you to leave your house and hand it over to me.

Why haven't you left? Same reason. It was property of the United States government.

49 posted on 08/25/2010 12:24:17 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
Why was the Lincoln government so intent on manning the Fort AFTER they were asked to leave ?

Because it was their fort.

50 posted on 08/25/2010 12:32:30 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Ah....thank you, Bubba Ho-Tep. You’ve stumbled and mumbled upon the truth.

You’ve inadvertantly explained The War Between the States.....and the multiple quicksands we keep finding ourselves submerged in 150 years later.


51 posted on 08/25/2010 12:34:49 PM PDT by colonel mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
There was no stumbling and mumbling, just a simple declaration of fact. Ft. Sumter was US government property and no one in South Carolina had any right to demand its surrender. And when they chose to use force, they got more than they expected.

Just out of curiosity, the Cuban government has long demanded that Guantanamo Bay be abandoned. Would you support their right to begin shelling the base?

52 posted on 08/25/2010 1:06:44 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Lincoln was a bad president, and the beginning of the end of this Republic.

An honest look at the low quality of the secession leaders is an effective cure for that kind of thinking.

53 posted on 08/25/2010 2:53:42 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va
I am sure the "Nations" ills would have occurred in the North without Lincoln. An independent South would have been spared the socialism and downward spiral.

The so-called "independent South", as you call it, began as an oppressed country already in a downward spiral.

The Confederacy was created by the same kind of people who regained control in the U.S. after Reconstruction and began ruining the U.S.A.; Democrats!

It is ridiculous to blame any of what happened after Reconstruction on Abraham Lincoln!
54 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:14 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Sorry, guys, but the majority of Americans do not consider the Tea Party, Fox News, Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter to be insufficiently conservative. Anyone who thinks Americans feel this way is seriously delusional.

I might agree, but I suspect well under 25% of Americans would join me. 1/4 of the population does not win elections.


I never said the majority of Americans do.
55 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:18 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I see the Southern brand of Republicans have begun to show up.

Who is that?
56 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:23 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Lincoln suspended several Constitutional protections during the war.

Would you please elaborate on exactly what Lincoln did and where? I must know what particularly you are talking about before I can reasonably respond.
57 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:25 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Other than destroying the republic, states rights and killing 6000,000 in the process, I have no problem with the man.

You certainly have a deceived version of history in your head!

Abraham Lincoln did everything in his might to keep the Union, the Republic, together! And he succeeded!

How is it a state right to be allowed to succeed from the Union?

The Civil War was never about states rights, it was about a rebellion trying to keep slavery!
58 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:29 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Lincoln was a bad president, and the beginning of the end of this Republic.

This Republic has yet to end! However, if the U.S.A. does end, you could actually take it all the way back to Andrew Jackson, the first president from the Democratic Party, and blame it on him!

But, it would be more reasonable to blame it on the person who actually did it.
59 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:41 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: colonel mosby
Everything has gone downhill since Lincoln first took the oath of office......Teddy, Woodrow, Franklin, Lyndon....now Barack. You can’t undo the damage they’ve done to the Republic.........unless.........

you just start over completely, as in.....REVOLUTION !


“Everything“, as you call it, began to go down hill after the Reconstruction period ended and the Democrats regained control of Congress!

Because of the unique form of government the U.S.A. has, I believe we can always undo any damage that might have been done in the past; just as long as we still have that form of government. We still have that form of government!

Irregardless of what you want to think, we still have elections and we still have the U.S. Constitution ruling us, the people of the U.S.A.

What needs to be done is: Constitutionalists need to be elected into office! No more Tea Party candidates, no more moderate Republicans, no more “Reagan Republicans“, etc. We need Constitutionalists, as in people of the Constitution Party! We need a majority rule of Constitutionalists.

When we achieve that, if we achieve that, then the U.S.A. will be restored.

So as long as we have this form of government, we can still restore it. That is something that is so great about this, our fore-fathers built a form of government that can only be defeated when it is no longer officially in power!
60 posted on 08/25/2010 5:31:49 PM PDT by JohnnyBibs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson