Posted on 08/20/2010 8:26:28 AM PDT by TwoOverhill
The debate about climate science, and the sloppiness with which the cost/benefit ratios of climate change and its proposed solutions are considered, are literally sucking all the air out of environmental discussion. While we argue about what global warming will or won’t mean for our New England forests 100 years from now, the emerald ash borer is out there today...
(Excerpt) Read more at palisadeshudson.com ...
“This carnage makes me wonder: Are we setting the right priorities in our efforts to protect the environment?”
Of course not. The reason? The “environmental” movement has almost NOTHING to do with protecting the environment. It has EVERYTHING to do with pushing a marxist/socialist agenda.
the sloppiness with which the cost/benefit ratios of climate change and its proposed solutions are considered,
Ok, since you brought it up, why do I give a flip if a certain species of tree dies, another one without it's vulnerabilities will replace it naturally.
Why spend one minute or one dime on this problem?
However; if you're concerned enough to contribute your own money to an organization that doesn't use taxpayers money, more power to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.