Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who's side is the homeland security secretary on?
Across the Back Fence ^ | 08/13/2010 | Todd Fitchette

Posted on 08/13/2010 8:21:08 PM PDT by WriteStuff

So… the US Constitution isn’t a “living document” that must breath with the times?

That’s what Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is intimating, at least in her comments on the 14th Amendment.

“Any talk about amending the constitution is just wrong,” Napolitano said. Her comment was reported on the network news this evening in a story about the call to address the birthright citizenship issue as it is said to relate to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativepoliticalblog.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 14thamendment; aliens; government; janetnapolitano; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: WriteStuff

So following my ex-Gov’s (sorry) reasoning, then the 14th Amendment, was wrong to being with? It was there to right a wrong, so using Janet’s logic, it was wrong for the States to even AMEND the Constitution.


21 posted on 08/13/2010 9:30:18 PM PDT by machogirl (First they came for my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

I like your attitude...heh. Yep, I only spend about 40% of my time apologizing...so maybe I have you beat... ha.

Much of my comments are made way too quick and without enough thought but I still enjoy it...seems to be a real problem.


22 posted on 08/13/2010 9:36:46 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WriteStuff

She should have been fired back when she asserted “the system worked” after the December terrorist attempt.....=.=


23 posted on 08/13/2010 9:37:02 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WriteStuff
Any talk about amending the constitution is just wrong,” Napolitano said.

The 14th Amendment AMENDS the Constitution. The ENTIRE Consititution. The MEANING of the Constitution. The INTENT of the Constitution. The PURPOSE of the Constitution. The REASON FOR the Constitution. The ESSENCE of the Constitution.

As you WELL KNOW.

BITCH.

24 posted on 08/14/2010 12:00:13 AM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WriteStuff

CHANGE


25 posted on 08/14/2010 4:55:15 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

Ping!


26 posted on 08/14/2010 5:38:58 AM PDT by HiJinx (I can see November from my front porch - and Mexico from the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

There is no need for any amendment to the 14th Amendment.

It is very clear in it’s intent. However, the 3 houses of our esteemed Fed government have selective reading and comprehension skills.

The MOST important part of the 14th “ . . . and subject to the jurisdiction thereof . . . “ is, and has been conveniently ignored by the powers that be for their own perverted benefit.

The bottom line is, anchor babies born on US soil are NOT ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the US. They are subject to the laws and regulations and jurisdiction of their illegal alien parents’ homeland.

No need for ‘living document’ interpretation.
Enforce the 14th as written and all will be well.


27 posted on 08/14/2010 7:59:26 AM PDT by LegalAlien1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Deagle; doc1019
I believe what doc1019 is saying is spot on. Judicial dictators in black robes effectively amend the constitution daily by twisting its meaning into all sorts of new rulings to meet their political agenda.

The amendment process was designed to be both difficult and cumbersome in order to make sure changes in the constitution were not the result of some short-term political whim or stylish trend, not to replace the other two branches of government with a judicial oligarchy.

28 posted on 08/14/2010 1:21:03 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson