[TheBigIf]

I am NOT going to support any organization that endorses candidates that seek to deny the people their right to representation and support giving the trial lawyers a boost in destroying the free market through lawsuits designed to promote fascism. If the TEA party or certain factions of it go that route then I will not support them.

I also have no problem speaking out on this issue at TEA party events and fighting it out with the phoney fiscal conservatives or phoney libertarians.

Any question you asked me could be turned right around on you. Are you going to try and force your views on the TEA party movement?

[Minn]

I am NOT going to support any organization that endorses candidates that seek to deny the people their right to representation and support giving the trial lawyers a boost in destroying the free market through lawsuits designed to promote fascism.

Specifically, what are you talking about? Who is being endorsed that is gung ho on giving lawyers power to sue in the name of fascism? Then, is they guy/gal worse on this apparent issue than his/her opponent?

[Raider Sam]

First, what group is seeking to deny people the right to representation? Just because you dont like your representation doesnt mean you are being denied representation.

Secondly, the tea party is not going in “that route,” so there really are only two reasons you would need to make statement with such false bravado. You either:

1) Want to be the first person to diss the tea party if they do change so you can look like you are ahead of the game
or
2) You dont like the tea party now (whether because you dont like fiscal conservatives or you think they dont like social conservatives)

Either way, you are projecting (a lib tactic) your opinion of a fiscal conservative onto an entire movement.

[Mariner]

No, I suspect that not unlike you I'll simply be an advocate.

I'll advocate for a simple, fiscal conservative agenda.