Specifically, what are you talking about? Who is being endorsed that is gung ho on giving lawyers power to sue in the name of fascism? Then, is they guy/gal worse on this apparent issue than his/her opponent?
The issue was not about someone specific but about whether or not the TEA party should limit their stand on individual liberty to only certain issues. I do not believe that they should be limited but should stand for all issues concerning limited government and individual liberty.