Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

In l994, after the GOP landslide, several hundred elected Democrats nationwide changed party affiliation. On Capitol Hill, notable were Billy Tauzin and Nathan Deal in the House, and Ben Nighthorse Campbell in the Senate.

Both caucuses are becoming more ideologically driven...the RINOs and the "blue dogs" are a declining breed. Within that context, it's interesting to speculate which Dems on Capitol Hill might be inclined to change sides.

The Dems are facing an increasing conservative groundswell in much of the country, and in the House, those that survive 2010 might not relish the thought of going into 2012 with Obama atop the ticket, and the nation mired in a severe economic downtown and continuing unemployment.

In the House, one member comes to mind, Oklahoma's David Boren. His comments on Obamacare, for example, could have been taken from the RCCC webpage. If the GOP wins the House, I think he's guaranteed to switch. But let's suppose the GOP comes up one or two seats short. We might see some significant interest by several Dems, especially if they just manage to eke out wins in their districts this fall. OTOH..they might decide to stay where they are, especially if they believe they would face a primary challenge from a conservative Republican in 2012. The recent example of Parker Griffith comes to mind..That could cause some to stay where they are.

I wonder if other Freepers have thoughts on possible Dem switchers.

In the Senate, there are no possibilities of a party change post 2010. Happily, though, several are looking at virtual lame duck status. I mean, how do you think Kent Conrad feels these days. He's going to follow Dorgan into retirement. I wonder if either will ever set foot in North Dakota again?

There is one interesting scenario to ponder..suppose the GOP comes up ONE seat short in the Senate...and we have a 50-50 split..would Lieberman throw it to the GOP? I suspect there's a chance he might, especially if the sitiation in the Mid-East is escalating. Also, the results in the CT senate race will have an impact. I don't think that McMahon can pull it out, but if it's a close race, that might help seal the deal for Joe to cross the aisle.

Anyone thinking that Ben Nelson might jump ship..well..no way..he'd be guaranteed to lose the GOP primary in 2012..I mean, one Arlen Spector is enough.. And of course, there's my home state of Florida. I think Rubio will pull it out, but if Crist does squeak by, then with Charlie, well, anything's possible. Rubio needs to focus on getting Crist to declare, publicy, as soon as possible, with whom he will caucus if he's elected. Of course, with Charlie, there's no shame. He appeared on Fox News in a debate with Rubio, and stated several tims that he's a "true conservative Republican." It's all about Charlie..nothing more, nothing less.

No, switching, if it occurs, will happen in the House... Hoping that other Freepers will opine on which, if any House Dems might cross over..your thoughts?

1 posted on 07/26/2010 11:51:26 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ken5050

John McCain and Goober might switch to the GOP?


2 posted on 07/26/2010 11:52:15 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint

FYI...possibly your list might find this of interest, want to opine..


3 posted on 07/26/2010 11:52:43 AM PDT by ken5050 (Save the Earth..It's the only planet with chocolate!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Mitt Romney.

Mitt’s a guy who will do, be, and say anything to be elected. Were this nation to demand politicians dress in clown suits, he’d be up there dressed as bozo. ;)


5 posted on 07/26/2010 11:55:08 AM PDT by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Any right wing leaning Rat who survives has a fairly high probability of party change.

i.e.

Heath Shuler NC
Rick Boucher VA


6 posted on 07/26/2010 11:55:10 AM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Senator Dim Webb aka Sen. Larry Flynt.


8 posted on 07/26/2010 11:56:17 AM PDT by DarthVader (That which supports Barack Hussein Obama must be sterilized and there are NO exceptions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

WE DON’T NEED NO STINKING ‘RATS!


10 posted on 07/26/2010 11:56:58 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Personally I wish they would do the hard thing and stay where they are and work on fixing their own house.


15 posted on 07/26/2010 12:01:57 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
I wonder if other Freepers have thoughts on possible Dem switchers.

Yes and, in my case, they have been relegated to the irrelevant file. Conservatives DON'T need more RINOs, we need conservatives who are staunch conservatives with eh strong conservative history and record.

BTW, I have statred previously that Dems and 'Pubbies are interchangeable on any given day and your post is just more proof that I am correct.

18 posted on 07/26/2010 12:05:39 PM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
There is a HUGE and as yet unfounded and unprovable assumption here. And that is that there will be a change of party majority in either the House or Senate or both after the November 2010 elections, and that this change will cause some dems to "jump ship" so to speak.

First, there is absolutely no proof whatsoever that there will be a change in either the House or Senate putting the rinos in a majority. The anger and/or hope upon which this assumption is based has cooled remarkably in the last few months....and continues to decline.

Second....there is little real difference between a rino and a dem. Except for the fact that the dems have a recognized "leader", and a party platform (rampant big government and socialism) to which they adhere religiously. Unlike the rinos who have no recognizable platform, no leadership, little morals, and no new ideas.

The current "throw the bums out" feeling is just that....a feeling! And, even if it came to fruition, there will be as many rinos unemployed as dems.

Last, given a very broad sword that cuts both ways in November....the new candidates that will get elected will have to be conservative to a fare-thee-well to make much of a difference at all between 01-2011 and 01-2013.

Therefore, I would not pin any "hopes" on a dem switching parties after the election. In most cases it won't matter if they did anyway.

24 posted on 07/26/2010 12:10:07 PM PDT by Logic n' Reason ("Buzzard's gotta eat; same as worms.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
There is one interesting scenario to ponder..suppose the GOP comes up ONE seat short in the Senate...and we have a 50-50 split..would Lieberman throw it to the GOP? I suspect there's a chance he might, especially if the sitiation in the Mid-East is escalating.

Joe is a liberal. The only areas where he differs with the most radical fringe of the Democratic Party are areas that are important to Israel: national security concerns in the Middle East region, the war in Iraq, and foreign policy regarding Israel and its enemies.

It's remotely possible that with a 50/50 Senate split in late November, there might be the offer of a really tasty committee chairmanship. And Lieberman, as an independent, might choose to caucus with the GOP instead of the Dems.

But it would take a miracle.

Please join me in prayer ...

26 posted on 07/26/2010 12:12:50 PM PDT by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Snowe, Collins, Graham, McCain...Oops! Never mind...


27 posted on 07/26/2010 12:13:01 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Do we really want any of them....really??????


29 posted on 07/26/2010 12:16:57 PM PDT by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
I don't trust any dems who are "Fair Weather" RINO's...only switching to save their asses.

Parties are based on ideology, and no one can change their lifelong beliefs, principles, and scrumples that fast, unless it is for convenience.

People with no conviction always root for the winning team...I don't like those people.
40 posted on 07/26/2010 12:28:37 PM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Both of the Nelsons in the Senate.


45 posted on 07/26/2010 12:35:17 PM PDT by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Unless they crossed over to vote against Porkulus / Obama Care / Kagan etc.

F 'em, they're not welcome.

The time to grow a pair of balls is when sticking to your principles costs you something, not when you're scurrying down the rope of a sinking ship to trying to save your ass.

46 posted on 07/26/2010 12:38:51 PM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Party switchers to the GOP should be welcomed. Remember Ronald Reagan once was a liberal Democrat (by his own description).


53 posted on 07/26/2010 12:55:23 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

I wish former Social Democrats could be banned from the Republican Party for a set number of years after leaving the Social Democrat Party. What Republicans don’t need is a flood of new Socialists. There are too many Republican quasi socialists already.


55 posted on 07/26/2010 1:27:59 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Shelby of Alabama switched after ‘94 too


56 posted on 07/26/2010 1:36:07 PM PDT by personalaccts (Is George W going to protect the border?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050

Don’t hold your breath. I don’t think the GOP will blow out anyone this fall.

McCain is gaining strength in AZ. Yes, that makes AZ a lock for the GOP, and a loss for conservatives. Angle isn’t doing well in Nevada. The dems have lots of money and union support. Anyone who thinks they are going to fall out in droves is deluding themselves. It will be a tough fight, and I’ll be shocked if we regain control of anything.

Given the weenie candidates we have, what difference would it make?


59 posted on 07/26/2010 3:49:45 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ken5050
Both caucuses are becoming more ideologically driven...the RINOs and the "blue dogs" are a declining breed. Within that context, it's interesting to speculate which Dems on Capitol Hill might be inclined to change sides.

As both parties have moved further apart it's doubtful that any Democrat is conservative enough to be welcomed into the GOP. The most conservative Democrat would, at best, be labeled a RINO if they did.

62 posted on 07/26/2010 5:03:23 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson