Bird Cage Liner of Record Liberates More Secrets

www.joytiz.com ^ | 7/26/10 | Joy Tiz

[jazminerose]

The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance. Nobody needs to know that. Nor did they find Obama’s murky past and lifetime of associations with radicals and known communists to be newsworthy. Nope. Nothing consequential about any of that. Just idle gossip, that was. McCarthyism, guilt by association and all that. (For the record, McCarthy was right).

Ninety-one thousand pages of classified war documents–that’s the news that’s fit to print at the Treason Times. The NYT has been causing colossal deforestation in its efforts to undermine national security since 9/11.

The NYT rules on what the news is today and the rest of the ovine media take their cues. Note the Times’ naked confession of treason (HT Michelle Malkin):

"Information that is marked ’secret’ has been determined to be information or material that the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause ’serious damage’ to the national security."

All the more reason to publish it if your goals are aligned with our enemies. There is always a delicate balance between the First Amendment and the people’s right to know what their government is doing. During a bloody war, the better part of valor means resolving doubt in favor of keeping classified documents classified for the time being.

Don’t fall for any faux indignation from Obama. He loves anything that makes our military or intelligence communities edgy. And his Red Press toadies are laying a foundation for premature withdrawal from Afghanistan.

[jazminerose]

Links:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/asia/26isi.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rsshas

http://joytiz.com/2009/barry’s-got-the-nuke-codes-but-no-security-clearance/

http://joytiz.com/2010/becks-mccarthy-awakening/

http://michellemalkin.com/

[Beowulf9]

Had to check out “See what the liberals are saying about Joy” section of the link barry’s got the nuke codes.

Of course it’s all wonderful, hate spewin’ fun by the libs but the last post was too amazing to me for words:

“Posted by: Byron Muhammad
Location: NA
To keep repeating the old lie about Min. Farrakhan as a bigoted and hate monger is to show that you are not a biased writer but you are in fact a tool of Satan.
Barry Soetoro: Profiles in Chaos
Posted by: Greg in Calgary
Email: greghin@calgary.net
URL:
Location: Calgary”

Yes, we all know what a wonderful, peace loving, fair-to- all colors type of guy Farrakhan is;)

[Onelifetogive]

(For the record, McCarthy was right).

I've been searching for a new tagline...

[davisfh]

Excellent post! The opening sentence "The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance" grabbed my attention and reminded me that I instinctively knew this in the beginning. Just too damned bad that Obama's followers were intellectually incapable of arriving at that "knowing."

Thanks again for the post. I'm now on Joy's e-mail list.

[jazminerose]

Here’s the link about Barry not being able to get a security clearance:

http://joytiz.com/2009/barry’s-got-the-nuke-codes-but-no-security-clearance/

[rbosque]

And the left cries every time we question their patriotism.

[LucyT]

Let’s see if these are workable Links:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/world/asia/26isi.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rsshas

http://joytiz.com/2009/barry’s-got-the-nuke-codes-but-no-security-clearance/

http://joytiz.com/2010/becks-mccarthy-awakening/

http://michellemalkin.com/

[LucyT]

The NYT has never bothered to report that the current Commander in Chief could not qualify for even a low level security clearance. Nobody needs to know that.

Nor did they find Obama’s murky past and lifetime of associations with radicals and known communists to be newsworthy. Nope. Nothing consequential about any of that. Just idle gossip, that was. McCarthyism, guilt by association and all that.

(For the record, McCarthy was right).

[snip]

Don’t fall for any faux indignation from Obama. He loves anything that makes our military or intelligence communities edgy. And his Red Press toadies are laying a foundation for..."

. . . . Article and # 7.

[Smokin' Joe]

Please keep in mind that a shutdown of the internet, (along with myriad e-mail servers) would bring a significant portion of American commerce to a screeching halt.

I know there are dozens of things I can order online more efficiently which are not carried by local vendors, and the ability to purchase specialized items from vendors which I would not be able to obtain locally has proven, on occasion, to be a critical business advantage.

Additionally, online investment accounts would be back to buggy-whip rates/speeds of manipulation, allowing those on the inside to make fortunes while the rest of America was plummeted into poverty or bailed out of the markets at fire-sale rates.

The economic destruction of the country would be complete.

That we have had anti-American persons in our intelligence community is no surprise, we were warned of such in the 1940s and 1950s (yes, McCarthy was right), and it is telling that somehow we seem unable to remove that infestation even today. While some may serve a purpose (strategic dis-information), everything has its limits.