Posted on 07/19/2010 5:00:25 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
ROFL! Good one. Will you be here all week? I tried the fish.
seems as if your trying to disrupt this thread; butterdezillion has contributed 'volumes' to the subject at hand-Constitutional eligibility issue. how and why info gets spread become irrelevant in seeking the truth on this subject.
my personal bet would be that you 'might be' a troll/subversive. pls. get into the spirit of info exchange here.
There is not one soul in this nation who can LEGALLY tell us what age Barack Obama is, where he was born, or who his parents were - including Obama himself. The only way a person can LEGALLY state any of those facts is if the thing Obama has been fighting with all our taxpayer money and all his strength actually happens - the BC is presented as evidence.
Right.
I don’t understand that. Aside from posting the whole thing here, how else is the information supposed to get out?
I don’t care a bit how many people visit my blog. I just want the information out there. It’s a lot more efficient to put it in one place and send people there to read it than it is to say it over and over a million times.
I can understand your point if you’re talking about a little article that can easily to posted here in its entirety, but for a longer post with many links it’s just a waste of time to redo it all here if you’ve already got it done someplace else.
And some of us who are putting stuff on our blogs have taken a lot of time to come up with what we’ve got and have a LOT more we still need to do. We have to be decent stewards of our time.
Why is it any more “dishonest, unethical, and parasitic” to link to a blog (that has information that took time to investigate and write up) than it is to post to what a so-called “reporter” reports?\
Good post. I agree. I also don’t understand what the invective is all about with this. Isn’t spreading the word all around a very good thing?
It appears that I have missed some posts, because the VA and Punchbowl references are new to me. Can you please provide me with a link to more info on this?
Thanks!
“Post that content and not an excerpt and you’ll never hear from me again” - HG
Don’t you have anything better to do than draw attention to posts that you don’t appreciate?
Are you trying to impose rules on the forum, more restrictive than the folks that run this forum?
Why?
Your behavior is truly puzzling.
Oh, excuse me. I must have overlooked all those posts where he does more than simply parrot certain ideas just to sound conservative. The ones where he advances the ideas of conservatism in ways that actually count.
That word gets thrown around a lot. Could you define a troll?
P.S. You don't know a damn thing about gunner.
It will be the subject of a large post once all the record-collecting is complete, Lord willing. What we know already is that there are big-time shenanigans going on with those 3 entities on this particular issue.
People laugh about “conspiracy theories”. It is what it is, and we know that these 3 agencies are all hiding and/or destroying records for one particular person - even to the point of denying she is buried where the records all along have said she is buried. Those records have been verified by the cemetery within the last 7 years as accurate. Then as soon as I started asking to see the records all evidence of her existence was removed.
Not only does everything associated with Obama have questions surrounding it - everything associated with Obama is also surrounded by criminal conduct on the part of the government stewards of that information/record/document.
The only agencies I’ve worked with that may not necessarily be corrupt are the Hawaii Archives office and the actual secretary I spoke with at the VA’s main office (who thought something was fishy since the records weren’t showing up. The official response I received from the VA did not come from her; it came directly from the head of that department).
That’s a very sad thing to have to say. The rule of law apparently means nothing to the vast majority of our government, media, and law enforcement personnel. Either that, or the leaders are all so corrupted that they keep anybody with integrity from being able to uphold the rule of law.
Of course that is essentially what the MSM says about all non old media sources. FOX both says it and has it said of them.
I think we just have to trust people to provide their own filters. But perhaps a special category would be a good idea, just to alert folks who do NOT go read the article. Some of them are very good about sources. Others not so much. Can't tell until you read it. Or choose not to do so for whatever reason.
I'm not sure that's not a distinction without a difference. Technically any case filed since Jan 20,2009, is about his exercising the powers of the office. Certainly the Chrysler dealers case is about that.
However using the 20th makes it clear that the President must qualify, and that has to mean more than just winning the electoral college election, which,bottom line, is all that Congress certified. They did not certify his qualifications, or if they did, they did it without requiring any proof thereof, such as we all have to provide to get a job, or do many other things.
Could you explain what the mechanism for injury to FR is when folks click on a blog link. Does FR have to pay per click or something? How exactly are they cheating FR or FReepers? I'm just confused.
Larry, who figured out that the Dan Rather “Bush memo” was a fake?
How did the “legitimate news sources” report on that story?
People have GOT to realize that the “legitimate news sources” are really not.
Hopefully very soon I will be able to “break” a story that debunks what EVERY DANG CONGRESSMAN IN THIS COUNTRY relied on to make a Constitutional decision - showing that it was a forgery PERPETRATED BY THE MEDIA ITSELF.
Do you think any “legitimate news source” will take this story? I’ll tell you the answer right now: No. I know because I’ve asked.
It comes down to a question of epistemology. Why do you think the “legitimate news sources” are “legitimate”? To whom are they accountable? What happens if they lie? What happens if they cover up a real story or report on something they know is false? What happens when they fail to issue corrections when they are corrected?
Exactly WHAT method of accountability makes you feel that the “legitimate news sources” are more trustworthy than any everyday old blogger?
When I “break” this story I will note that it is a blog. I will post the entire thing here but you’ll have to go to my blog to get the links to the documentation because I don’t have time to embed all that stuff using HTML, with which I am not familiar.
I’m sorry that it will be considered dog poop in your estimation - that it will be cause for people to be disgusted with Free Republic because this is a venue which allows this story to be told to a wide audience - the ONLY venue which allows this story to be told to a wide audience because none of the “legitimate news sources” will touch it.
I don’t mean to push anybody away from Free Republic, but the truth of the matter is that if they don’t know that the “legitimate news sources” are corrupt then they really NEED a wake-up call.
Although he does look like a troll, an ugly one at that, he's not a troll. He's.. well.. hmm... he's Humblegunner. One of a kind, but if you look in the dictionary under curmudgeon, you might see his picture, at least in line drawing form. Dictionaries have to be careful about not scaring the children, or causing disruption in libraries when people happen on disturbing imagery.
But he can be a very funny fellow, and is kind to pets. I almost said animals, but certain ones, like bambi, he likes to kill and eat. He's been known to take on the pets of fallen FRiends, for the rest of their lives.
Although he does look like a troll, an ugly one at that, he's not a troll. He's.. well.. hmm... he's Humblegunner. One of a kind, but if you look in the dictionary under curmudgeon, you might see his picture, at least in line drawing form. Dictionaries have to be careful about not scaring the children, or causing disruption in libraries when people happen on disturbing imagery.
But he can be a very funny fellow, and is kind to pets. I almost said animals, but certain ones, like bambi, he likes to kill and eat. He's been known to take on the pets of fallen FRiends, for the rest of their lives.
I am strongly in agreement about the level of criminal conduct engaged in by this administration, and by many members of congress and countless bureaucrats. They don't even try to hide it any more - just do what they damn well please and dare anyone to do anything about it, rule of law be damned.
The silver lining here is that many people have been awakened to the lies and corruption, and more are becoming aware every day. The next two election cycles will tell us much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.