Were You Lying Then or Are You Lying Now?

jbjd ^ | 07.17,10 | jbjd

[jbjd]

...We might generously assume the 62 freshman legislators were so green when they took office they didn’t know the difference between a paid political advertisement and a proffer of proof, notwithstanding 15 are lawyers. But can they have reached the second half of the 2nd session of the 111th Congress and still think these two are the same? Have they ignored ongoing correspondence from constituents documenting members of the Democratic Party, including their Speaker, who signed these Certifications of Nomination, refuse to identify documents that were the basis for their determination Mr. Obama is a natural born citizen? Even in states where the nominee for President of the major political party must be qualified for that office before election officials may legally print his name on the ballot?

Our Representatives told us in January 2009 according to ‘evidence’ they relied on, they believed Barack Obama was Constitutionally qualified for office. Notwithstanding we've since torn that evidence apart, they haven't exercised their authority to seek more. So, they still believe the record establishes, he is a natural born citizen. Assuming they still believe in their Oath of Office. Because they still haven’t introduced Articles of Impeachment.

WERE THEY LYING THEN OR ARE THEY LYING NOW?

On November 2, 2010, all 435 seats in the House are up for election. Based on the failure of our Representatives, now incumbents, to demonstrate they appreciate the solemn public trust inherent in their positions, as evidenced by their ongoing decision to ignore constituent petitions for an inquiry into the President’s Constitutional qualifications for office; why would we want any one of them back on the job?

Each member of the House of Representatives will constructively forfeit the privilege of reelection by failing to introduce a Resolution of Impeachment before the November 2010 election...

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

One congressman sent a letter to the whitehouse asking the bamster to produce his long form BC.It was never answered.A few congressmen and women do listen to their constituents. A few.

[jbjd]

How do you know? Is this letter posted on the Congressperson’s web site? And, even assuming the story is true, that is, a Congressperson asked the POTUS to produce a long form birth certificate and this request was denied; what reason could explain that this Congressman did not introduce Articles of Impeachment at that time, having been ignored by a co-equal branch of government during an inquiry to establish whether its chief Executive was Constitutionally qualified for the job?

[Vaduz]

We no longer have statesmen we have dumb cheap and easy hacks.

[jbjd]

If you can make your Representative less “dumb” then by all means, send along the links to the full article on my blog, which contains links to supporting documentation of all allegations. (And if you are not one of those “dumb cheap and easy hacks” why don’t you run for office?)

[jbjd]

Wrong inquiry. Representatives needs to ask the Speaker, the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, on what documentary basis did she ascertain BO is a NBC, before swearing he was, to state election officials in those states that require eligibility for office to appear on the ballot; in order to get those officials to print his name on the ballot. (Of course, when Ms. Pelosi signed those Certifications of Mr. Obama’s Nomination which she subsequently submitted to the states; Ms. Pelosi was acting in her civilian role as Chair of the DNC Services Corporation Presidential Nominating Convention.) And whatever documentation Ms. Pelosi produces as the result of any current request, has to have existed before she signed those Certifications on or around August 27, 2008.

[Non-Sequitur]

bump