Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/17/2010 9:52:09 AM PDT by profgoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: profgoose
"We find no evidence of lack of integrity except at the highest levels of government."

There, fixed it.

2 posted on 07/17/2010 10:02:34 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose
Just thinking...Someone came up with those high numbers...9000 PSI... to start with....which would also be related to the "flow" which is related to the "fine" that they're gonna get nailed for..

My best guess is that the cap was designed for the 9000 number and they're pretty happy with the true numbers.

3 posted on 07/17/2010 10:06:51 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

He is sayong of course tht the wellisn’t leaking, not that there is any interity, either at BP or in Washington.


4 posted on 07/17/2010 10:10:47 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose
He is saying of course that the well isn’t leaking, not that there is any integrity, either at BP or in Washington.
5 posted on 07/17/2010 10:11:16 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

6 posted on 07/17/2010 10:17:07 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

Something nobody is talking about...the fact that oil is spewing out of that well at 100,000 barrels a day. THAT’S A LOT OF OIL! What if the Gulf at 5,000 feet below sea level has enough oil to last us for another 200 years?


7 posted on 07/17/2010 10:56:04 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

Pressure readings after 41 hours were 6,745 pounds per square inch and rising slowly, Wells said, below the 7,500 psi that would have reassured scientists the well was not leaking. ...


18 posted on 07/17/2010 2:04:31 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2553884/posts


22 posted on 07/17/2010 2:29:34 PM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

What worries her most about the current spill are the unknown effects of the dispersant chemicals used to break up oil into small droplets that sink into the water column. “If they put dispersants into any body of water without the presence of oil, people would be up in arms about the release of such toxic substances,” she says. “But because they are being applied in the name of remediation, people stand by and say it’s OK. But it isn’t OK at all; it’s making the Gulf a big experiment with no baseline to judge the real consequences.”

Federal government biologists who approved the use of dispersants say the chemicals are the lesser of two evils: they are toxic to some extent, but they keep the oil from reaching sensitive wetland habitat along the coast. I ask Earle about this but, aside from the limited use of dispersants to protect specific marshes from approaching slicks, she will have none of it.

“Deploying dispersants at the well head and on the surface many miles from shore is shockingly irresponsible,” she says. “It means you are taking oil that could be collected on the surface and [causing] it to go where it is impossible to recover. Life in the water column is exposed to the chemicals from the surface... and it’s killing all the way.”

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727680.100-pioneer-aquanaut-how-not-to-clean-up-an-oil-spill.html?full=true


23 posted on 07/17/2010 2:35:09 PM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: profgoose

On July 8, 2010, the Associated Press reported that U.S. Reps. Barney Frank and John Tierney stated publicly that Dr. Lubchenco should resign, and Frank said he intends to bring his request to the White House. Frank and Tierney represent New Bedford and Gloucester, Massachusetts respectively, New England’s biggest fishing ports. The two Democrats took the unusual step of calling for a senior appointee of a President of their own party to resign, saying she’s failed their region’s struggling fishermen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Lubchenco


25 posted on 07/17/2010 2:39:09 PM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson