[sirchtruth]

All day yesterday and already beginning today. You people need some perspective. I saw this video and if you think Megyn ripped Kristen to sheds then you're bias is really showing.

All Megyn did was show Kristen didn't read the testimony of the whistleblower, and Kristen kept emphasizing why should she since there was an injunction against the perps? Also, what was very lame is Kristen bringing up Bush and without relaying one example tried to equate it to Bushes policies. Which was totally ludicrous.

I admire Megyn greatly, but she didn't slay it...

[WillVoteForFood]

I tend to agree. Very few of the “Host x destroyed flatulent lib y” tend to be as good as advertised.

[wayoverontheright]

I think it would have been a more powerful argument for Megyn to have pointed out that the DOJ dropping the case sends a message that nothing will happen to any black who decides to intimidate white voters at polling stations in the future.

An injunction, Kirsten? So what? This "punishment" is supposed to discourage future lawlessness? How does an injunction do that?

Would not a large fine and incarceration perhaps show more seriousness on the part of the DOJ and dispel the charges of the whistleblower?

[darbymcgill]

"I admire Megyn greatly, but she didn't slay it..."

I beg to differ... When Kirsten began here talking points she said, "i don't think he was intimidating anyone".. By the end of the segment she was agreeing with Megyn that there was intimidation..

Kirsten pwned...