Yes, but many (if not most) have learned to lie about those achievements and use the system to get ahead. Like StolarStorm stated (post #9), those I've employed have overstated their experience and CANNOT problem-solve. It is very frustrating trying to convince them that RESULTS matter, not the appearance of adequacy.
I think the problem you are having is one of academics.
In academics, everything is an exercise of looking up data on a problem that has a definitive solution - if you just know where to look.
In life, we have no idea what the answers are; so we invent them. This is 180 degrees out of phase with most academia. So, you have to modify your interview technique to screen the academics from the problem solvers.
I do this by asking questions that require thought. Such as “Name 5 reasons why a man-hole cover is round”.